Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP Top 10:2025vsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how OWASP Top 10:2025 controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
60%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP Top 10:2025 maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 60% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 10 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in SSRF.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 10 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Access Control(5 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-1A01:2025 Broken Access Control5 targets
3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit
3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists
3.7.1Key generation procedures
FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup

Cryptography(2 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-2A02:2025 Cryptographic Failures and Secret Management2 targets
3.7Establish and Maintain a Data Classification Scheme
3.7.1Key generation procedures

Injection(3 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-3A03:2025 Injection Including Cross-Site Scripting3 targets
3.16System and Services Acquisition
3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
3.5Securely Dispose of Data

Component Security(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-6A06:2025 Vulnerable and Outdated Components
3.7.1Key generation procedures

Authentication(2 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-7A07:2025 Identification and Authentication Failures2 targets
3.7Establish and Maintain a Data Classification Scheme
3.7.1Key generation procedures

Logging and Monitoring(3 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-9A09:2025 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures3 targets
3.3.1Audit Record Creation
3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices
3.6.1Incident Response Capability

Related Comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between OWASP Top 10:2025 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

OWASP Top 10:2025 has 10 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (60% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SSRF, where 1 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP Top 10:2025 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 10 total OWASP Top 10:2025 controls, 6 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 60% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP Top 10:2025 to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

4 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in SSRF with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP Top 10:2025 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is SSRF (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.