TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-146vsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how NIST SP 800-146 controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-146 maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 50% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST SP 800-146 controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Audit, Cost, and Continuous Improvement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Cloud Adoption Strategy(4 mappings)

NISTSP146-1Cloud Adoption Strategy, Workload Suitability, and Decision Framework4 targets
→3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest
→3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists
→FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup

IaaS Operational Posture(2 mappings)

NISTSP146-4IaaS Operational Recommendations and Workload Hardening2 targets
→FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy
→FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration

Security and Privacy Posture(9 mappings)

NISTSP146-6Cloud Security and Privacy Recommendations9 targets
→3.12Segment Data Processing and Storage Based on Sensitivity
→3.3.1Audit Record Creation
→3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices
→3.6.1Incident Response Capability
→3.7Establish and Maintain a Data Classification Scheme
→3.7.1Key generation procedures
→FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection
→FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest
→FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity

Operational Quality and Portability(2 mappings)

NISTSP146-7Service Level, Performance, Reliability, Interoperability, and Portability2 targets
→3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-146 comparisons

NIST SP 800-146 vs OWASP MASVS4 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs OWASP ASVS4 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs ISO 270184 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.04 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs ISO 270194 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs ISO/IEC 27400:20224 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs ISO 270174 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs IEC 624434 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements18 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements17 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements16 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-146 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

NIST SP 800-146 has 8 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Audit, Cost, and Continuous Improvement, where 1 NIST SP 800-146 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-146 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 8 total NIST SP 800-146 controls, 4 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-146 to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

4 NIST SP 800-146 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Audit, Cost, and Continuous Improvement with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-146 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Audit, Cost, and Continuous Improvement (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.