TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5vsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

59
Controls Mapped
113
Gaps Found
20%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 20% coverage across 34 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 172 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls identifies 138 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in SC - System and Communications Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 172 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 59 mapped controls across 14 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

AC - Access Control(4 mappings)

NIST800-AC-2Account management
→3.10Physical and Environmental Protection
NIST800-AC-20Use of external systems
→3.10Physical and Environmental Protection
NIST800-AC-6Least privilege
→3.7.1Multi-Factor Authentication Assessment
NIST800-AC-7Unsuccessful logon attempts
→3.10Physical and Environmental Protection

AT - Awareness and Training(1 mappings)

NIST800-AT-3Role-based training
→3.7.1Multi-Factor Authentication Assessment

AU - Audit and Accountability(3 mappings)

NIST800-AU-12Audit record generation
→3.3.1Audit Event Assessment
NIST800-AU-2Event logging
→3.3.1Audit Event Assessment
NIST800-AU-3Content of audit records
→3.3.1Audit Event Assessment

CA - Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring(1 mappings)

NIST800-CA-7Continuous monitoring
→3.12Security Assessment and Monitoring

CM - Configuration Management(4 mappings)

NIST800-CM-4Impact analyses2 targets
→FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy
→FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration
NIST800-CM-9Configuration management plan2 targets
→FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy
→FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration

CP - Contingency Planning(4 mappings)

NIST800-CP-10System recovery and reconstitution2 targets
→3.6Incident Response
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
NIST800-CP-9System backup2 targets
→3.6Incident Response
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup

IA - Identification and Authentication(3 mappings)

NIST800-IA-4Identifier management2 targets
→3.7Identification and Authentication
→3.7.1Multi-Factor Authentication Assessment
NIST800-IA-7Cryptographic module authentication
→3.7Identification and Authentication

+39 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 comparisons

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange36 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs FedRAMP Rev 534 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs CSA CCM v433 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments33 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management33 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)33 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges33 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)33 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 has 172 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 34 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SC - System and Communications Protection, where 15 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 172 total NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls, 34 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 138 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

138 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in SC - System and Communications Protection with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is SC - System and Communications Protection (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.