IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards ManualvsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0
See exactly how IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual controls map to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual maps to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 with 22% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 9 IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual controls identifies 7 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in IATA IOSA Section 7 - CGO.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 9 controls analysed | 702 frameworks | 342K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 342K+ mappings across 702 frameworks.
IATA IOSA Section 1 - ORG(1 mappings)
IATA IOSA Section 8 - SEC(4 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual comparisons
Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 702 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 702 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (342K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual has 9 controls across its framework, while CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (22% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in IATA IOSA Section 7 - CGO, where 1 IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual controls have no direct CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 equivalent.
How many controls map between IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
Of 9 total IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual controls, 2 map directly to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls — representing 22% coverage. The remaining 7 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
7 IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in IATA IOSA Section 7 - CGO with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
The domain with the highest gap count is IATA IOSA Section 7 - CGO (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.