TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)vsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls map to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

51
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
62%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) maps to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 with 62% coverage across 20 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Configuration and Identification Assessment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 51 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Access Control Assessment(17 mappings)

171A-AC-02Assess Access Enforcement2 targets
→CPG-1.CUnique Credentials
→CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation
171A-AC-04Assess Separation of Duties
→CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation
171A-AC-05Assess Least Privilege
→CPG-1.CUnique Credentials
171A-AC-06Assess Remote Access Controls6 targets
→CPG-1.AChanging Default Passwords
→CPG-1.CUnique Credentials
→CPG-1.DRevoking Credentials for Departing Employees
→CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training
→CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training
→CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation
171A-AC-07Assess Wireless Access Controls7 targets
→CPG-1.AChanging Default Passwords
→CPG-1.CUnique Credentials
→CPG-3.ALog Collection
→CPG-3.BSecure Log Storage
→CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training
→CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training
→CPG-8.CEncrypted DNS

Awareness and Training / Audit Assessment(3 mappings)

171A-AT-01Assess Security Awareness Training3 targets
→CPG-1.CUnique Credentials
→CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training
→CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training

+31 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security22 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs NIST Privacy Framework21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)20 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)20 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs ISO 27001:202220 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs SLSA19 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs SIG (Shared Assessments)19 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs PTES19 mappings

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.014 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.014 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappingsNIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.012 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.012 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.012 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) has 32 controls across its framework, while CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 20 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Configuration and Identification Assessment, where 4 NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls have no direct CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

Of 32 total NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls, 20 map directly to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

12 NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Configuration and Identification Assessment with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Configuration and Identification Assessment (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.