TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards ManualvsIMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)

See exactly how IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual controls map to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
7
Gaps Found
22%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual maps to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) with 22% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 9 IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual controls identifies 7 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in IATA IOSA Section 7 - CGO.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 9 controls analysed | 701 frameworks | 337K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 337K+ mappings across 701 frameworks.

IATA IOSA Section 1 - ORG(1 mappings)

IATA-IOSA-Section1-ORG-Organization-ManagementSystem-SMSIATA IOSA Section 1 - ORG Organization and Management System + Safety Management System (SMS) + Safety Policy + Hazard ID + Quality
→IMO-MSC-FAL-Identify-AssetInventory-ThreatsVulnerabilities-CyberRiskAssessment-RolesResponsibilitiesIMO MSC-FAL Identify Function - OT/IT Asset Inventory + Threats + Vulnerabilities + Cyber Risk Assessment + Roles and Responsibilities + Crew + CSO + DPA

IATA IOSA Section 8 - SEC(1 mappings)

IATA-IOSA-Section8-SEC-SecurityManagement-AVSECIATA IOSA Section 8 - SEC Security Management + Aviation Security Programme (AVSEC) + ICAO Annex 17 Alignment
→IMO-MSC-FAL-Protect-AccessControl-NetworkSegmentation-MalwareDefence-Patch-Awareness-DataSecurityIMO MSC-FAL Protect Function - Access Control + Network Segmentation + Malware Defence + Patch Management + Awareness Training + Data Security + Crew BYOD + Removable Media

Related Comparisons

Other IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual comparisons

IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual vs MITRE ATT&CK2 mappingsIATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification2 mappingsIATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual vs NIST SP 800-922 mappingsIATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual vs NIST SP 800-882 mappingsIATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security2 mappingsIATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual vs NIST SP 800-63-42 mappingsIATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual vs NIST SP 800-612 mappingsIATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual vs NIST SP 800-1372 mappings

Other IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)5 mappingsIEC 62443 vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)5 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)5 mappingsAPI 1164 vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)5 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)5 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)5 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)4 mappingsDAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)4 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 701 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 701 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (337K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual and IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual has 9 controls across its framework, while IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (22% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in IATA IOSA Section 7 - CGO, where 1 IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual controls have no direct IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) equivalent.

How many controls map between IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual and IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

Of 9 total IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual controls, 2 map directly to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) controls — representing 22% coverage. The remaining 7 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

7 IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual controls have no direct equivalent in IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2). The highest concentration of gaps is in IATA IOSA Section 7 - CGO with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual and IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

The domain with the highest gap count is IATA IOSA Section 7 - CGO (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.