TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AWS Well-Architected Security PillarvsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0

See exactly how AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls map to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
71
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar maps to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 with 10% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 89 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls identifies 80 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Identity & Access Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 89 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Cloud Security Overview(1 mappings)

AWS-WA-01Shared responsibility model definition
→CPG-6.BSupply Chain Incident Reporting

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud(5 mappings)

AWS-WA-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud4 targets
→CPG-1.AChanging Default Passwords
→CPG-1.CUnique Credentials
→CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training
→CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training
AWS-WA-08Privileged access in cloud environments
→CPG-1.CUnique Credentials

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud(7 mappings)

AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data4 targets
→CPG-3.ALog Collection
→CPG-3.BSecure Log Storage
→CPG-3.CStrong and Agile Encryption
→CPG-8.CEncrypted DNS
AWS-WA-14Data backup and recovery in cloud2 targets
→CPG-3.CStrong and Agile Encryption
→CPG-7.CSystem Backups
AWS-WA-15Secure data deletion in cloud
→CPG-3.CStrong and Agile Encryption

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Infrastructure Security(2 mappings)

AWS-WA-16Virtual network segmentation2 targets
→CPG-1.DRevoking Credentials for Departing Employees
→CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(3 mappings)

AWS-WA-22Incident response in cloud2 targets
→CPG-7.AIncident Reporting
→CPG-7.DIncident Response Testing
AWS-WA-23Cloud vulnerability management
→CPG-5.AVulnerability Disclosure Program

Related Comparisons

Other AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14619 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14519 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14419 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs MTCS (Singapore)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISMAP (Japan)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs Azure Security Benchmark19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-19019 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701719 mappings

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

Azure Security Benchmark vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.014 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappingsNIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.012 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.012 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.012 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar has 89 controls across its framework, while CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Identity & Access Management, where 15 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

Of 89 total AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, 9 map directly to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 80 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

80 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Identity & Access Management with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Identity & Access Management (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.