TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)vsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)

See exactly how HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls map to Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

34
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
54%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) maps to Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) with 54% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls identifies 11 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Domain 1: Governance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 34 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Domain 1: Governance(10 mappings)

CRAF-1.1Cyber Risk Governance5 targets
→AESCSF-SC-1Supply Chain Risk Management
→AESCSF-TVM-2Threat Intelligence
→FAA-CS-3.1Data-Driven Risk Management
→FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management
→GAMP5-1.1Risk-Based Approach
CRAF-1.2Cyber Risk Strategy5 targets
→AESCSF-SC-1Supply Chain Risk Management
→AESCSF-TVM-2Threat Intelligence
→FAA-CS-3.1Data-Driven Risk Management
→FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management
→GAMP5-1.1Risk-Based Approach

Domain 2: Identification(4 mappings)

CRAF-2.2Risk and Threat Assessment4 targets
→AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability Assessment
→CDP-RM-1Risk Identification Process
→CDP-RM-3Value Chain Risk Assessment
→GAMP5-1.2Patient Safety Risk Assessment

Domain 3: Protection(6 mappings)

CRAF-3.1Access Control
→AESCSF-IAM-2Access Control
CRAF-3.3Infrastructure Security
→AESCSF-ACM-2Configuration Management
CRAF-3.4Application Security
→CSA-TVM-03Application Security (DevSecOps)
CRAF-3.6Third-Party Risk Management3 targets
→AESCSF-SC-1Supply Chain Risk Management
→AESCSF-TVM-2Threat Intelligence
→FAA-CS-3.1Data-Driven Risk Management

+14 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) comparisons

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)15 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation15 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.014 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs RBI Cybersecurity Framework for Banks14 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)14 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs CSA CCM v414 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)14 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)13 mappings

Other Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) comparisons

CSA CCM v4 vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)24 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)22 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)22 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)22 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)22 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)22 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)22 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)22 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)?

HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) has 24 controls across its framework, while Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) covers 39 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (54% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Domain 1: Governance, where 3 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) equivalent.

How many controls map between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)?

Of 24 total HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls, 13 map directly to Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls — representing 54% coverage. The remaining 11 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) to Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)?

11 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct equivalent in Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF). The highest concentration of gaps is in Domain 1: Governance with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Domain 1: Governance (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.