TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9vsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)

See exactly how BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls map to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
37
Gaps Found
5%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 maps to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) with 5% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Food Safety and Quality Management System.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Senior Management Commitment(1 mappings)

1.1SWIFT Environment Protection
→ILO-FPRW-Cat5-OSH-SafeHealthyEnvironment-C155-C187-2022AmendmentILO Fundamental Category 5 - Safe and Healthy Working Environment (C155 + C187) + 2022 Amendment Adding OSH as Fundamental Right

Food Safety and Quality Management System(1 mappings)

3.1Physical Security
→ILO-FPRW-Cat5-OSH-SafeHealthyEnvironment-C155-C187-2022AmendmentILO Fundamental Category 5 - Safe and Healthy Working Environment (C155 + C187) + 2022 Amendment Adding OSH as Fundamental Right

Related Comparisons

Other BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 comparisons

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products8 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs FDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR)8 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System8 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs ISO/IEC 27003:20178 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories8 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence8 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements8 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs ICH E6(R3) - Good Clinical Practice7 mappings

Other ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) comparisons

Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)3 mappingsGerman Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)3 mappingsFair Labor Association (FLA) Workplace Code of Conduct vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)3 mappingsDAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)2 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)2 mappingsUN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)2 mappingsOECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)2 mappingsSWIFT CSCF vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)1 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 has 39 controls across its framework, while ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (5% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Food Safety and Quality Management System, where 4 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls have no direct ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) equivalent.

How many controls map between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

Of 39 total BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls, 2 map directly to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls — representing 5% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

37 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls have no direct equivalent in ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions). The highest concentration of gaps is in Food Safety and Quality Management System with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Food Safety and Quality Management System (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.