German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)vsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)
See exactly how German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) controls map to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) maps to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) with 31% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 13 German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) controls identifies 9 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Complaints and Reporting (Sections 9-10).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 13 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Risk Management System (Section 4)(3 mappings)
Policy and Prevention (Sections 6-7)(3 mappings)
Remedial Action (Section 8)(1 mappings)
Complaints and Reporting (Sections 9-10)(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) comparisons
Other ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) and ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?
German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) has 13 controls across its framework, while ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) covers 10 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (31% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Complaints and Reporting (Sections 9-10), where 3 German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) controls have no direct ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) equivalent.
How many controls map between German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) and ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?
Of 13 total German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) controls, 4 map directly to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls — representing 31% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?
9 German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) controls have no direct equivalent in ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions). The highest concentration of gaps is in Complaints and Reporting (Sections 9-10) with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) and ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Complaints and Reporting (Sections 9-10) (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.