Cross-Framework Mapping

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9vsISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories

See exactly how BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls map to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

37
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
43%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 maps to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories with 43% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Product and Process Control.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 37 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Senior Management Commitment(9 mappings)

1.1Senior Management Commitment and Continual Improvement3 targets
ISO-15189-8.1General requirements
ISO-17025-8.1Options
ISO-17025-8.7Corrective actions
1.2Food Safety and Quality Culture3 targets
ISO-15189-6.7Service agreements
ISO-17025-5.1Legal entity
ISO-17025-5.4Personnel for the management system
1.3Organizational Structure and Responsibilities3 targets
ISO-15189-6.7Service agreements
ISO-17025-5.1Legal entity
ISO-17025-5.4Personnel for the management system

Food Safety and Quality Management System(11 mappings)

3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual6 targets
ISO-15189-6.3Facilities and environmental conditions
ISO-15189-6.5Equipment calibration and metrological traceability
ISO-15189-8.1General requirements
ISO-17025-6.5Metrological traceability
ISO-17025-8.1Options
ISO-17025-8.7Corrective actions
3.2Document Control3 targets
ISO-15189-6.3Facilities and environmental conditions
ISO-15189-6.5Equipment calibration and metrological traceability
ISO-17025-6.5Metrological traceability
3.3Record Completion and Maintenance2 targets
ISO-15189-6.7Service agreements
ISO-17025-5.1Legal entity

+17 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 has 28 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories covers 65 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (43% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Product and Process Control, where 5 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories equivalent.

How many controls map between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?

Of 28 total BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls, 12 map directly to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls — representing 43% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?

16 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories. The highest concentration of gaps is in Product and Process Control with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?

The domain with the highest gap count is Product and Process Control (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.