TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)vsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)

See exactly how Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) controls map to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
21
Gaps Found
13%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) maps to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) with 13% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) controls identifies 27 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Assessment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Implementation and Governance(4 mappings)

IG-3Continuous Improvement
→ILO-FP-5.2Promotional Framework for OSH Convention (C187)
IG-4Incident Response3 targets
→ILO-FP-2.2Abolition of Forced Labour Convention (C105)
→ILO-FP-3.1Minimum Age Convention (C138)
→ILO-FP-3.2Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention (C182)

Risk Assessment(6 mappings)

RA-2Human Rights Risk Identification3 targets
→ILO-FP-2.2Abolition of Forced Labour Convention (C105)
→ILO-FP-3.1Minimum Age Convention (C138)
→ILO-FP-3.2Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention (C182)
RA-4Rule of Law Assessment3 targets
→ILO-FP-2.2Abolition of Forced Labour Convention (C105)
→ILO-FP-3.1Minimum Age Convention (C138)
→ILO-FP-3.2Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention (C182)

Related Comparisons

Other Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) comparisons

Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) vs German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)8 mappingsVoluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) vs ASEAN Data Management Framework7 mappingsVoluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) vs Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)7 mappingsVoluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) vs AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)7 mappingsVoluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) vs Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)7 mappingsVoluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) vs UK Modern Slavery Act 20157 mappingsVoluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)7 mappingsVoluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) vs IEC 624436 mappings

Other ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) comparisons

ASEAN Data Management Framework vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsEU Better Internet for Kids (BIK+) Strategy vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsGerman Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)4 mappingsOECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)3 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) has 31 controls across its framework, while ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) covers 10 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (13% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Assessment, where 11 Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) controls have no direct ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) equivalent.

How many controls map between Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

Of 31 total Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) controls, 4 map directly to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls — representing 13% coverage. The remaining 27 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

27 Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) controls have no direct equivalent in ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions). The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Assessment with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) and ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Assessment (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.