TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update)vsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)

See exactly how OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update) controls map to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update) maps to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) with 12% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update) controls identifies 7 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Due Diligence Implementation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Concepts and General Policies(2 mappings)

OECDMNE-1Concepts and General Policies, Risk-Based Due Diligence Framework2 targets
→ILO-FPRW-Cat2-ForcedLabour-C29-C105-Protocol2014ILO Fundamental Category 2 - Elimination of Forced or Compulsory Labour (C29 + C105) + 2014 Forced Labour Protocol + Modern Slavery
→ILO-FPRW-Cat3-ChildLabour-MinimumAge-WorstForms-C138-C182ILO Fundamental Category 3 - Effective Abolition of Child Labour (C138 Minimum Age + C182 Worst Forms)

Related Comparisons

Other OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update) comparisons

OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update) vs Fair Labor Association (FLA) Workplace Code of Conduct3 mappingsOECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update) vs OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence (2024 Update)3 mappingsOECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update) vs ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement3 mappingsOECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update) vs ISO 26000:20103 mappingsOECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update) vs NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)2 mappingsOECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update) vs BREEAM - Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method2 mappingsOECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update) vs ISO 140012 mappingsOECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update) vs ISO/IEC 38500:2024 - Governance of IT2 mappings

Other ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) comparisons

Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)3 mappingsGerman Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)3 mappingsFair Labor Association (FLA) Workplace Code of Conduct vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)3 mappingsDAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)2 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)2 mappingsUN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)2 mappingsSWIFT CSCF vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)1 mappingsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)1 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update) and ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update) has 8 controls across its framework, while ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Due Diligence Implementation, where 1 OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update) controls have no direct ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) equivalent.

How many controls map between OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update) and ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

Of 8 total OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update) controls, 1 map directly to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 7 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update) to ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

7 OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update) controls have no direct equivalent in ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions). The highest concentration of gaps is in Due Diligence Implementation with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct (2023 Update) and ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Due Diligence Implementation (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.