Cross-Framework Mapping

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9vsISO/IEC 27003:2017

See exactly how BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls map to ISO/IEC 27003:2017. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

32
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
43%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 maps to ISO/IEC 27003:2017 with 43% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Product and Process Control.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 32 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Senior Management Commitment(5 mappings)

1.1Senior Management Commitment and Continual Improvement3 targets
AS9100D-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
ISO27003-10.1Continual Improvement
ISO27003-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
1.2Food Safety and Quality Culture
ISO27003-4.3Determining the Scope of the ISMS
1.3Organizational Structure and Responsibilities
ISO27003-4.3Determining the Scope of the ISMS

Food Safety and Quality Management System(15 mappings)

3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual6 targets
5.3Management of Allergens
8.5Production and Service Provision
8.5.2Identification and Traceability
AS9100D-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
ISO27003-10.1Continual Improvement
ISO27003-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
3.2Document Control3 targets
5.3Management of Allergens
8.5Production and Service Provision
8.5.2Identification and Traceability
3.3Record Completion and Maintenance
ISO27003-4.3Determining the Scope of the ISMS
3.4Internal Audits3 targets
5.3Management of Allergens
8.5Production and Service Provision
8.5.2Identification and Traceability
3.5Management of Suppliers2 targets
AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, and Services
ISO27003-4.2Understanding Needs and Expectations of Interested Parties

+12 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27003:2017 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 has 28 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27003:2017 covers 57 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (43% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Product and Process Control, where 5 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27003:2017 equivalent.

How many controls map between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

Of 28 total BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls, 12 map directly to ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls — representing 43% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 to ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

16 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27003:2017. The highest concentration of gaps is in Product and Process Control with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

The domain with the highest gap count is Product and Process Control (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.