TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9vsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

27
Controls Mapped
1
Gaps Found
43%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 43% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Product and Process Control.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 27 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Senior Management Commitment(7 mappings)

1.1Senior Management Commitment and Continual Improvement
→3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual
1.2Food Safety and Quality Culture3 targets
→3.3Record Completion and Maintenance
→FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
1.3Organizational Structure and Responsibilities3 targets
→3.3Record Completion and Maintenance
→FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup

Food Safety and Quality Management System(8 mappings)

3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual
→3.4Internal Audits
3.2Document Control
→3.4Internal Audits
3.3Record Completion and Maintenance2 targets
→FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
3.4Internal Audits2 targets
→3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual
→3.2Document Control
3.5Management of Suppliers2 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management

Site Standards(5 mappings)

4.1External Standards3 targets
→3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual
→3.2Document Control
→3.4Internal Audits
4.2Building Fabric and Facilities2 targets
→3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual
→3.2Document Control

+7 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 comparisons

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence12 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs FDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR)12 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System12 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs ISO/IEC 27003:201712 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products12 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories12 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence12 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food12 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 has 28 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (43% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Product and Process Control, where 5 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 28 total BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls, 12 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 43% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

16 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Product and Process Control with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Product and Process Control (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.