Cross-Framework Mapping

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9vsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
24
Gaps Found
21%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 21% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Food Safety Plan (HACCP).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Senior Management Commitment(7 mappings)

1.1SWIFT Environment Protection
3.1Physical Security
1.2Operating System Privileged Account Control3 targets
3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists
FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
1.3Virtualisation Platform Protection3 targets
3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists
FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup

Food Safety and Quality Management System(8 mappings)

3.1Physical Security
3.4Enforce Data Retention
3.2Establish and Maintain a Data Inventory
3.4Enforce Data Retention
3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists2 targets
FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
3.4Enforce Data Retention2 targets
3.1Physical Security
3.2Establish and Maintain a Data Inventory
3.5Securely Dispose of Data2 targets
3.16System and Services Acquisition
3.17Supply Chain Risk Management

Related Comparisons

Other BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 has 39 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Food Safety Plan (HACCP), where 4 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 39 total BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls, 8 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

31 BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Food Safety Plan (HACCP) with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Food Safety Plan (HACCP) (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.