TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)vsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

23
Controls Mapped
14
Gaps Found
43%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 43% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Monitoring.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 725 frameworks | 447K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 23 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 447K+ mappings across 725 frameworks.

Security Management and Governance(8 mappings)

AWWA-1.1Security Policy and Governance3 targets
→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet defined criteria
→NIST-CSF-GV.OC-01Organizational context for cybersecurity risk management is understood
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed
AWWA-1.2Risk Assessment3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Opportunities for improvements are identified from risk assessments
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-01Vulnerabilities in assets are identified, validated, and recorded
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09Integrity and accuracy of risk assessment results are verified
AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training2 targets
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed
→NIST-CSF-PR.AT-01Personnel are provided awareness and training to perform cybersecurity duties

Access Control and Identity Management(5 mappings)

AWWA-2.1User Access Management
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed
AWWA-2.2Authentication Mechanisms3 targets
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-02Identities are proofed and bound to credentials based on the context of interactions
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-03Users, services, and hardware are authenticated
AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-06Physical access to assets is managed, monitored, and enforced

Network and Communications Security(3 mappings)

AWWA-3.1Network Segmentation
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-01Networks and environments are protected from unauthorized access
AWWA-3.2Remote Access Security
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed
AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection
→NIST-CSF-PR.DS-01The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-at-rest are protected

System Security and Operations(4 mappings)

AWWA-4.1Malware Protection
→NIST-CSF-DE.CM-09Computing hardware and software are monitored to find potentially adverse events
AWWA-4.2Patch Management
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-01Vulnerabilities in assets are identified, validated, and recorded
AWWA-4.3Configuration Management
→NIST-CSF-PR.PS-01Configuration management practices are established and applied
AWWA-4.4Audit Logging and Monitoring
→NIST-CSF-DE.CM-01Networks and network services are monitored to find potentially adverse events

+3 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 725 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs South Korea ISMS-P13 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security12 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments12 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)12 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs MARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges12 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)12 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity12 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation12 mappings

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.082 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.032 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.032 mappingsASEAN Data Management Framework vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.025 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.020 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.020 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 725 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 725 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (447K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) has 37 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (43% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Monitoring, where 2 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 37 total AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls, 16 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 43% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

21 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Monitoring with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Monitoring (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.