TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)vsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

23
Controls Mapped
14
Gaps Found
43%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 43% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls identifies 21 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Monitoring.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 685 frameworks | 306K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 23 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 306K+ mappings across 685 frameworks.

Security Management and Governance(8 mappings)

AWWA-1.1Security Policy and Governance3 targets
→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet the defined incident criteria
→NIST-CSF-GV.OC-01The organizational mission is understood and informs cybersecurity risk management
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties
AWWA-1.2Risk Assessment3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Strategic opportunities (i.e., positive risks) are characterized and are included in organizational cybersecurity risk discussions
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-01Vulnerabilities in assets are identified, validated, and recorded
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09The authenticity and integrity of hardware and software are assessed prior to acquisition and use
AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training2 targets
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties
→NIST-CSF-PR.AT-01Personnel are provided with awareness and training so that they possess the knowledge and skills to perform general tasks with cybersecurity risks in mind

Access Control and Identity Management(5 mappings)

AWWA-2.1User Access Management
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties
AWWA-2.2Authentication Mechanisms3 targets
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed by the organization
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-02Identities are proofed and bound to credentials based on the context of interactions
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-03Users, services, and hardware are authenticated
AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-06Physical access to assets is managed, monitored, and enforced commensurate with risk

Network and Communications Security(3 mappings)

AWWA-3.1Network Segmentation
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-01Networks and environments are protected from unauthorized logical access and usage
AWWA-3.2Remote Access Security
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties
AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection
→NIST-CSF-PR.DS-01The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-at-rest are protected

System Security and Operations(4 mappings)

AWWA-4.1Malware Protection
→NIST-CSF-DE.CM-09Computing hardware and software, runtime environments, and their data are monitored to find potentially adverse events
AWWA-4.2Patch Management
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-01Vulnerabilities in assets are identified, validated, and recorded
AWWA-4.3Configuration Management
→NIST-CSF-PR.PS-01Configuration management practices are established and applied
AWWA-4.4Audit Logging and Monitoring
→NIST-CSF-DE.CM-01Networks and network services are monitored to find potentially adverse events

+3 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 685 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

A AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls your existing AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) into NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 into AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 43% in the header counts how many AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs South Korea ISMS-P13 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security12 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs SLSA11 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs SIG (Shared Assessments)11 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs PTES11 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs OWASP SAMM11 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs OWASP MASVS11 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs OpenSSF Scorecard11 mappings

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0106 mappingsCloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0104 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0104 mappingsFedRAMP Moderate vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0104 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0104 mappingsFedRAMP High vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0104 mappingsSOC 2 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0104 mappingsAustralian Information Security Manual vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0103 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 685 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 685 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (306K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) has 37 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (43% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Monitoring, where 2 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 37 total AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls, 16 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, representing 43% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

21 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Monitoring with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Monitoring (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.