AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)vsOpenSSF Scorecard
See exactly how AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls map to OpenSSF Scorecard. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) maps to OpenSSF Scorecard with 30% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls identifies 26 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Monitoring.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Security Management and Governance(2 mappings)
Access Control and Identity Management(4 mappings)
Network and Communications Security(3 mappings)
System Security and Operations(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons
Other OpenSSF Scorecard comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and OpenSSF Scorecard?
AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) has 37 controls across its framework, while OpenSSF Scorecard covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (30% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Monitoring, where 2 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct OpenSSF Scorecard equivalent.
How many controls map between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and OpenSSF Scorecard?
Of 37 total AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls, 11 map directly to OpenSSF Scorecard controls — representing 30% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) to OpenSSF Scorecard?
26 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct equivalent in OpenSSF Scorecard. The highest concentration of gaps is in Monitoring with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and OpenSSF Scorecard?
The domain with the highest gap count is Monitoring (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.