SOC 2vsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar
See exactly how SOC 2 controls map to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
SOC 2 maps to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar with 51% coverage across 31 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 61 SOC 2 controls identifies 32 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in P - Privacy.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 61 controls analysed | 878 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 81 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 878 frameworks.
A - Availability(1 mappings)
C - Confidentiality(5 mappings)
CC - Common Criteria (Security)(14 mappings)
+61 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 878 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The SOC 2 to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls your existing SOC 2 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. SOC 2 into AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar lands at 39.7%, while AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar into SOC 2 lands at 29.5%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your SOC 2 evidence buys you for AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar, the other asks the reverse.
25 of 63 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls are evidenced by work you have already done for SOC 2. 38 are genuine gaps.
18 of 61 SOC 2 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. 43 are genuine gaps.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 51% in the header counts how many SOC 2 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other SOC 2 comparisons
Other AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 878 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 878 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between SOC 2 and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?
SOC 2 has 61 controls across its framework, while AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar covers 63 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 31 overlapping controls (51% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in P - Privacy, where 16 SOC 2 controls have no direct AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar equivalent.
How many controls map between SOC 2 and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?
Of 61 total SOC 2 controls, 31 map directly to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, representing 51% coverage. The remaining 32 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping SOC 2 to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?
32 SOC 2 controls have no direct equivalent in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. The highest concentration of gaps is in P - Privacy with 16 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between SOC 2 and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?
The domain with the highest gap count is P - Privacy (16 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.