Cross-Framework Mapping

SOC 2vsFedRAMP Moderate

See exactly how SOC 2 controls map to FedRAMP Moderate. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

723
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
85%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which FedRAMP Moderate controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SOC 2 maps to FedRAMP Moderate with 85% coverage across 52 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 61 SOC 2 controls identifies 9 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in P - Privacy.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 61 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 723 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

A - Availability(20 mappings)

SOC2-A1.1Maintains capacity to meet availability commitments6 targets
AU-4Audit Log Storage Capacity
CP-7(2)Alternate Processing Site | Accessibility. Identify potential accessibility problems to alternate processing sites in the event of an area-wide disruption or disaster and outlines explicit mitigation actions
CP-8(1)Telecommunications Services | Priority of Service Provisions. (a) Develop primary and alternate telecommunications service agreements that contain priority-of-service provisions in accordance with availability requirements (including recovery time objectives); and (b) Request Telecommunications Service Priority
MA-6Timely Maintenance. Obtain maintenance support and/or spare parts for [Assignment: organization-defined system components] within [Assignment: organization-defined time period] of failure
SC-22Architecture and Provisioning for Name/Address Resolution Service
SC-5Denial-of-Service Protection
SOC2-A1.2Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability14 targets
CP-10System Recovery and Reconstitution
CP-2Contingency Plan
CP-2(8)Contingency Plan | Identify Critical Assets. Identify critical system assets supporting [Selection: all; essential] mission and business functions
CP-6Alternate Storage Site
CP-6(3)Alternate Storage Site | Accessibility. Identify potential accessibility problems to the alternate storage site in the event of an area-wide disruption or disaster and outline explicit mitigation actions
CP-7Alternate Processing Site
CP-7(1)Alternate Processing Site | Separation from Primary Site. Identify an alternate processing site that is sufficiently separated from the primary processing site to reduce susceptibility to the same threats
CP-8Telecommunications Services
CP-8(1)Telecommunications Services | Priority of Service Provisions. (a) Develop primary and alternate telecommunications service agreements that contain priority-of-service provisions in accordance with availability requirements (including recovery time objectives); and (b) Request Telecommunications Service Priority
CP-8(2)Telecommunications Services | Single Points of Failure. Obtain alternate telecommunications services to reduce the likelihood of sharing a single point of failure with primary telecommunications services
CP-9System Backup
CP-9(1)Testing for Reliability and Integrity
IR-3Incident Response Testing
MA-2Controlled Maintenance

+703 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The SOC 2 to FedRAMP Moderate crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which FedRAMP Moderate controls your existing SOC 2 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. SOC 2 into FedRAMP Moderate lands at 14.9%, while FedRAMP Moderate into SOC 2 lands at 60.7%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your SOC 2 evidence buys you for FedRAMP Moderate, the other asks the reverse.

SOC 2 into FedRAMP Moderate
14.9%

48 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls are evidenced by work you have already done for SOC 2. 275 are genuine gaps.

26.1%CP - Contingency Planning
11.6%AC - Access Control
14.8%CM - Configuration Management
21.1%PE - Physical and Environmental Protection
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 678 candidate mappings were examined and 545 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: AC-2 Account Management

Users are registered and authorized, and access is removed when no longer appropriate.

Grounded in SOC2-CC6.2 Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: AC-1 Policy and Procedures

Develop and disseminate access control policy and procedures; review at least annually (FedRAMP parameter); update following defined events.

Every one of the 48 evidenced controls and 275 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

FedRAMP Moderate into SOC 2
60.7%

37 of 61 SOC 2 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for FedRAMP Moderate. 24 are genuine gaps.

84.8%CC - Common Criteria (Security)
16.7%P - Privacy
66.7%A - Availability
100%C - Confidentiality
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 135 candidate mappings were examined and 32 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: SOC2-A1.2 Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability

Emergency power is an environmental protection supporting availability.

Grounded in PE-11 Emergency Power. Provide an uninterruptible power supply to facilitate [Selection (one or more): an orderly shutdown of the system; transition of the system to long-term alternate power] in the event of a primary power. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: SOC2-A1.1 Maintains capacity to meet availability commitments

Maintains, monitors, and evaluates current processing capacity and use of system components (infrastructure, data, and software) to manage capacity demand and to enable the implementation of additional capacity to help meet its objectives

Every one of the 37 evidenced controls and 24 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

SOC 2 to FedRAMP Moderate
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 85% in the header counts how many SOC 2 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many FedRAMP Moderate controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between SOC 2 and FedRAMP Moderate?

SOC 2 has 61 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP Moderate covers 238 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 52 overlapping controls (85% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in P - Privacy, where 9 SOC 2 controls have no direct FedRAMP Moderate equivalent.

How many controls map between SOC 2 and FedRAMP Moderate?

Of 61 total SOC 2 controls, 52 map directly to FedRAMP Moderate controls, representing 85% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SOC 2 to FedRAMP Moderate?

9 SOC 2 controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP Moderate. The highest concentration of gaps is in P - Privacy with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SOC 2 and FedRAMP Moderate?

The domain with the highest gap count is P - Privacy (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.