TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FedRAMP ModeratevsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar

See exactly how FedRAMP Moderate controls map to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
232
Gaps Found
3%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FedRAMP Moderate maps to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar with 3% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 238 FedRAMP Moderate controls identifies 232 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Other.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 238 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Other(6 mappings)

AC-2Account Management
→AWS-WA-04Regulatory compliance for cloud services
CA-8Penetration Testing
→AWS-WA-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
CA-9Internal System Connections
→AWS-WA-01Shared responsibility model definition
IR-2Incident Response and Recovery
→AWS-WA-03Cloud risk assessment
IR-4Incident Handling
→AWS-WA-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
RA-1Policy and Procedures
→AWS-WA-03Cloud risk assessment

Related Comparisons

Other FedRAMP Moderate comparisons

FedRAMP Moderate vs Azure Security Benchmark6 mappingsFedRAMP Moderate vs NIST SP 800-1905 mappingsFedRAMP Moderate vs ISO 270175 mappingsFedRAMP Moderate vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements5 mappingsFedRAMP Moderate vs ISO 270185 mappingsFedRAMP Moderate vs API 11644 mappingsFedRAMP Moderate vs BSI IT-Grundschutz4 mappingsFedRAMP Moderate vs NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)4 mappings

Other AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar comparisons

NIST SP 800-146 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsNIST SP 800-190 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsISO 27017 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FedRAMP Moderate and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

FedRAMP Moderate has 238 controls across its framework, while AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar covers 89 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (3% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Other, where 232 FedRAMP Moderate controls have no direct AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar equivalent.

How many controls map between FedRAMP Moderate and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

Of 238 total FedRAMP Moderate controls, 6 map directly to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls — representing 3% coverage. The remaining 232 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FedRAMP Moderate to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

232 FedRAMP Moderate controls have no direct equivalent in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. The highest concentration of gaps is in Other with 232 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FedRAMP Moderate and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

The domain with the highest gap count is Other (232 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.