Cross-Framework Mapping

SOC 2vsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5

See exactly how SOC 2 controls map to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

882
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
100%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SOC 2 maps to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 with 100% coverage across 61 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 61 SOC 2 controls identifies 2 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in About the Trust Services Criteria – SOC 2.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 61 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 882 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.

A - Availability(20 mappings)

SOC2-A1.1A1.1 Managing processing capacity7 targets
→NIST800-AU-4AU-4 Audit Log Storage Capacity
→NIST800-CA-7CA-7 Continuous Monitoring
→NIST800-CP-2CP-2 Contingency Plan
→NIST800-CP-9CP-9 System Backup
→NIST800-SC-6SC-6 Resource Availability
→NIST800-SI-13SI-13 Predictable Failure Prevention
→SP800-53-SCSystem and Communications Protection Family
SOC2-A1.2A1.2 Environmental protection, backup and recovery infrastructure13 targets
→NIST800-CP-10CP-10 System Recovery and Reconstitution
→NIST800-CP-11CP-11 Alternate Communications Protocols
→NIST800-CP-2CP-2 Contingency Plan
→NIST800-CP-6CP-6 Alternate Storage Site
→NIST800-CP-7CP-7 Alternate Processing Site
→NIST800-CP-8CP-8 Telecommunications Services
→NIST800-CP-9CP-9 System Backup
→NIST800-MA-2MA-2 Controlled Maintenance
→NIST800-PE-10PE-10 Emergency Shutoff
→NIST800-PE-11PE-11 Emergency Power
→NIST800-PE-12PE-12 Emergency Lighting
→NIST800-PE-13PE-13 Fire Protection
→NIST800-PE-14PE-14 Environmental Controls

+862 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The SOC 2 to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls your existing SOC 2 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. SOC 2 into NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 lands at 6.5%, while NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 into SOC 2 lands at 80.3%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your SOC 2 evidence buys you for NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5, the other asks the reverse.

SOC 2 into NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
6.5%

66 of 1014 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for SOC 2. 948 are genuine gaps.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 into SOC 2
80.3%

49 of 61 SOC 2 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. 12 are genuine gaps.

SOC 2 to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 100% in the header counts how many SOC 2 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 868 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between SOC 2 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

SOC 2 has 61 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 covers 1,014 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 61 overlapping controls (100% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in About the Trust Services Criteria – SOC 2, where 2 SOC 2 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 equivalent.

How many controls map between SOC 2 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

Of 61 total SOC 2 controls, 61 map directly to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls, representing 100% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SOC 2 to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

2 SOC 2 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. The highest concentration of gaps is in About the Trust Services Criteria – SOC 2 with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SOC 2 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?

The domain with the highest gap count is About the Trust Services Criteria – SOC 2 (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.