SOC 2vsCloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1
See exactly how SOC 2 controls map to Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
SOC 2 maps to Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 with 100% coverage across 61 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 61 SOC 2 controls identifies 0 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in P - Privacy.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 61 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 173 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
A - Availability(9 mappings)
C - Confidentiality(5 mappings)
CC - Common Criteria (Security)(6 mappings)
+153 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The SOC 2 to Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls your existing SOC 2 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. SOC 2 into Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 lands at 37.6%, while Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 into SOC 2 lands at 57.4%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your SOC 2 evidence buys you for Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1, the other asks the reverse.
74 of 197 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for SOC 2. 123 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Ongoing and separate evaluations must be selected, developed and performed.
Grounded in SOC2-CC4.1 COSO principle 16: Selects and develops ongoing and separate evaluations. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Confirm during each audit that the organisation meets every standard, regulation, contract clause and statutory obligation inside the audit scope, and record the outcome for each one.
Every one of the 74 evidenced controls and 123 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
35 of 61 SOC 2 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1. 26 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Capacity and resource planning is the same availability capacity requirement.
Grounded in CCM-IVS-02 Capacity and Resource Planning. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Demonstrates a commitment to integrity and ethical values
Every one of the 35 evidenced controls and 26 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 100% in the header counts how many SOC 2 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other SOC 2 comparisons
Other Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between SOC 2 and Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1?
SOC 2 has 61 controls across its framework, while Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 covers 197 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 61 overlapping controls (100% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in P - Privacy, where 0 SOC 2 controls have no direct Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 equivalent.
How many controls map between SOC 2 and Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1?
Of 61 total SOC 2 controls, 61 map directly to Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls, representing 100% coverage. The remaining 0 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping SOC 2 to Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1?
0 SOC 2 controls have no direct equivalent in Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1. The highest concentration of gaps is in P - Privacy with 0 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between SOC 2 and Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1?
The domain with the highest gap count is P - Privacy (0 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.