Cross-Framework Mapping

SOC 2vsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE

See exactly how SOC 2 controls map to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

546
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
85%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SOC 2 maps to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE with 85% coverage across 52 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 61 SOC 2 controls identifies 9 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in P - Privacy.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 61 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 546 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

A - Availability(20 mappings)

SOC2-A1.1Maintains capacity to meet availability commitments6 targets
AU-4Audit Log Storage Capacity
CP-7(2)Alternate Processing Site | Accessibility. Identify potential accessibility problems to alternate processing sites in the event of an area-wide disruption or disaster and outlines explicit mitigation actions
CP-8(1)Telecommunications Services | Priority of Service Provisions. (a) Develop primary and alternate telecommunications service agreements that contain priority-of-service provisions in accordance with availability requirements (including recovery time objectives); and (b) Request Telecommunications Service Priority
MA-6Timely Maintenance. Obtain maintenance support and/or spare parts for [Assignment: organization-defined system components] within [Assignment: organization-defined time period] of failure
SC-22Architecture and Provisioning for Name/Address Resolution Service
SC-5Denial-of-Service Protection
SOC2-A1.2Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability14 targets
CP-10System Recovery and Reconstitution
CP-2Contingency Plan
CP-2(8)Contingency Plan | Identify Critical Assets. Identify critical system assets supporting [Selection: all; essential] mission and business functions
CP-6Alternate Storage Site
CP-6(3)Alternate Storage Site | Accessibility. Identify potential accessibility problems to the alternate storage site in the event of an area-wide disruption or disaster and outline explicit mitigation actions
CP-7Alternate Processing Site
CP-7(1)Alternate Processing Site | Separation from Primary Site. Identify an alternate processing site that is sufficiently separated from the primary processing site to reduce susceptibility to the same threats
CP-8Telecommunications Services
CP-8(1)Telecommunications Services | Priority of Service Provisions. (a) Develop primary and alternate telecommunications service agreements that contain priority-of-service provisions in accordance with availability requirements (including recovery time objectives); and (b) Request Telecommunications Service Priority
CP-8(2)Telecommunications Services | Single Points of Failure. Obtain alternate telecommunications services to reduce the likelihood of sharing a single point of failure with primary telecommunications services
CP-9System Backup
CP-9(1)Testing for Reliability and Integrity
IR-3Incident Response Testing
MA-2Controlled Maintenance

+526 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

A SOC 2 to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE controls your existing SOC 2 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

SOC 2 into NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE into SOC 2
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

SOC 2 to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 85% in the header counts how many SOC 2 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between SOC 2 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE?

SOC 2 has 61 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE covers 275 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 52 overlapping controls (85% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in P - Privacy, where 9 SOC 2 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE equivalent.

How many controls map between SOC 2 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE?

Of 61 total SOC 2 controls, 52 map directly to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE controls, representing 85% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SOC 2 to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE?

9 SOC 2 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE. The highest concentration of gaps is in P - Privacy with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SOC 2 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE?

The domain with the highest gap count is P - Privacy (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.