SOC 2vsISO 27002:2022
See exactly how SOC 2 controls map to ISO 27002:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which ISO 27002:2022 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
SOC 2 maps to ISO 27002:2022 with 97% coverage across 59 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 61 SOC 2 controls identifies 2 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in P - Privacy.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 61 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 374 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
A - Availability(16 mappings)
C - Confidentiality(4 mappings)
+354 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The SOC 2 to ISO 27002:2022 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO 27002:2022 controls your existing SOC 2 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
45 of 93 ISO 27002:2022 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for SOC 2. 48 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Policy deployment of control activities is the evidence an assessor wants for security policies.
Grounded in SOC2-CC5.3 COSO principle 12: Deploys control activities through policies and procedures. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Requires rules for acceptable use, and procedures for handling information and its associated assets, to be identified, documented and put into effect.
Every one of the 45 evidenced controls and 48 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
28 of 61 SOC 2 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ISO 27002:2022. 33 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Capacity management monitors and plans resource use against demand.
Grounded in iso-27002-2022::8.6 Capacity management. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Demonstrates a commitment to integrity and ethical values
Every one of the 28 evidenced controls and 33 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 97% in the header counts how many SOC 2 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO 27002:2022 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other SOC 2 comparisons
Other ISO 27002:2022 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between SOC 2 and ISO 27002:2022?
SOC 2 has 61 controls across its framework, while ISO 27002:2022 covers 104 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 59 overlapping controls (97% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in P - Privacy, where 1 SOC 2 controls have no direct ISO 27002:2022 equivalent.
How many controls map between SOC 2 and ISO 27002:2022?
Of 61 total SOC 2 controls, 59 map directly to ISO 27002:2022 controls, representing 97% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping SOC 2 to ISO 27002:2022?
2 SOC 2 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27002:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in P - Privacy with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between SOC 2 and ISO 27002:2022?
The domain with the highest gap count is P - Privacy (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.