Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27001:2022vsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar

See exactly how ISO 27001:2022 controls map to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

144
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
66%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27001:2022 maps to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar with 66% coverage across 61 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 93 ISO 27001:2022 controls identifies 67 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Physical controls – ISO 27001:2022.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 93 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 144 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.

Organizational controls – ISO 27001:2022(20 mappings)

iso-27001-2022::5.1Policies for information security
→SEC01-BP03Identify and validate control objectives
iso-27001-2022::5.10Acceptable use of information and other associated assets
→SEC07-BP02Apply data protection controls based on data sensitivity
iso-27001-2022::5.12Classification of information3 targets
→SEC07-BP01Understand your data classification scheme
→SEC07-BP02Apply data protection controls based on data sensitivity
→SEC07-BP03Automate identification and classification
iso-27001-2022::5.13Labelling of information2 targets
→SEC07-BP01Understand your data classification scheme
→SEC07-BP03Automate identification and classification
iso-27001-2022::5.14Information transfer3 targets
→SEC03-BP08Share resources securely within your organization
→SEC03-BP09Share resources securely with a third party
→SEC09-BP02Enforce encryption in transit
iso-27001-2022::5.15Access control4 targets
→SEC02-BP06Employ user groups and attributes
→SEC03-BP01Define access requirements
→SEC03-BP02Grant least privilege access
→SEC03-BP05Define permission guardrails for your organization
iso-27001-2022::5.16Identity management3 targets
→SEC02-BP04Rely on a centralized identity provider
→SEC02-BP05Audit and rotate credentials periodically
→SEC03-BP06Manage access based on lifecycle
iso-27001-2022::5.17Authentication information3 targets
→SEC02-BP01Use strong sign-in mechanisms
→SEC02-BP02Use temporary credentials
→SEC02-BP03Store and use secrets securely

+124 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The ISO 27001:2022 to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls your existing ISO 27001:2022 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. ISO 27001:2022 into AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar lands at 54%, while AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar into ISO 27001:2022 lands at 36.6%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your ISO 27001:2022 evidence buys you for AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar, the other asks the reverse.

ISO 27001:2022 into AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar
54%

34 of 63 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ISO 27001:2022. 29 are genuine gaps.

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar into ISO 27001:2022
36.6%

34 of 93 ISO 27001:2022 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. 59 are genuine gaps.

ISO 27001:2022 to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 66% in the header counts how many ISO 27001:2022 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 868 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27001:2022 and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

ISO 27001:2022 has 93 controls across its framework, while AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar covers 63 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 61 overlapping controls (66% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Physical controls – ISO 27001:2022, where 14 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27001:2022 and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

Of 93 total ISO 27001:2022 controls, 61 map directly to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, representing 66% coverage. The remaining 67 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27001:2022 to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

67 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. The highest concentration of gaps is in Physical controls – ISO 27001:2022 with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27001:2022 and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

The domain with the highest gap count is Physical controls – ISO 27001:2022 (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.