Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP Top 10:2025vsNIST SP 800-61

See exactly how OWASP Top 10:2025 controls map to NIST SP 800-61. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
11
Gaps Found
42%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP Top 10:2025 maps to NIST SP 800-61 with 42% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in SSRF.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Access Control(2 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-1A01:2025 Broken Access Control2 targets
NISTSP61-2Computer Security Incident Response Team (CSIRT) Structure and Staffing
NISTSP61-5Containment, Eradication, and Recovery

Cryptography(2 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-2A02:2025 Cryptographic Failures and Secret Management2 targets
NISTSP61-3Preparation: Communications, Toolkits, Training, Exercises, Threat Intelligence
NISTSP61-5Containment, Eradication, and Recovery

Secure Design(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-4A04:2025 Insecure Design and Business Logic (incl. A11 API Abuse)
NISTSP61-3Preparation: Communications, Toolkits, Training, Exercises, Threat Intelligence

Component Security(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-6A06:2025 Vulnerable and Outdated Components
NISTSP61-5Containment, Eradication, and Recovery

Authentication(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-7A07:2025 Identification and Authentication Failures
NISTSP61-5Containment, Eradication, and Recovery

Logging and Monitoring(1 mappings)

OWASPTOP10-9A09:2025 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
NISTSP61-4Detection and Analysis: Sources, Triage, Categorisation, Prioritisation

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 700 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between OWASP Top 10:2025 and NIST SP 800-61?

OWASP Top 10:2025 has 19 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-61 covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (42% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SSRF, where 1 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-61 equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP Top 10:2025 and NIST SP 800-61?

Of 19 total OWASP Top 10:2025 controls, 6 map directly to NIST SP 800-61 controls — representing 42% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP Top 10:2025 to NIST SP 800-61?

4 OWASP Top 10:2025 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-61. The highest concentration of gaps is in SSRF with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP Top 10:2025 and NIST SP 800-61?

The domain with the highest gap count is SSRF (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.