TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT SecurityvsCSA CCM v4

See exactly how NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls map to CSA CCM v4. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

59
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
76%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security maps to CSA CCM v4 with 76% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in OT Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 59 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

OT Security Controls(20 mappings)

NIST82-CTL-01OT Access Control4 targets
→CSA-IAM-01Identity and access management policy and procedures
→CSA-IAM-05Least privilege
→CSA-IAM-11CSC authorization to tenant and service component provisioning
→CSA-IAM-16Authorization mechanisms
NIST82-CTL-02OT Authentication and Credential Management3 targets
→CSA-IAM-02Strong password policy and procedures
→CSA-IAM-14Strong authentication
→CSA-IAM-15Passwords management
NIST82-CTL-03OT Audit and Monitoring6 targets
→CSA-CCC-04Unauthorized change protection
→CSA-CCC-08Exception management
→CSA-CEK-05Encryption change management
→CSA-LOG-01Logging and monitoring policy
→CSA-LOG-03Security monitoring and alerting
→CSA-LOG-07Logging scope
NIST82-CTL-04OT Patch Management4 targets
→CSA-BCR-02Risk assessment and impact analysis
→CSA-BCR-04Business continuity planning
→CSA-BCR-05Documentation
→CSA-TVM-01Vulnerability Management
NIST82-CTL-05OT Configuration Management3 targets
→CSA-CCC-04Unauthorized change protection
→CSA-CCC-08Exception management
→CSA-CEK-05Encryption change management

+39 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange17 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)17 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines17 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.016 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs API 116416 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs IEC 6244316 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs DO-326A / ED-202A16 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs NIST SP 1800-3216 mappings

Other CSA CCM v4 comparisons

TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs CSA CCM v446 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs CSA CCM v443 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs CSA CCM v443 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs CSA CCM v443 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs CSA CCM v443 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework 1.0 vs CSA CCM v442 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs CSA CCM v442 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs CSA CCM v442 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and CSA CCM v4?

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security has 21 controls across its framework, while CSA CCM v4 covers 171 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (76% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in OT Risk Management, where 3 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls have no direct CSA CCM v4 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and CSA CCM v4?

Of 21 total NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls, 16 map directly to CSA CCM v4 controls — representing 76% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security to CSA CCM v4?

5 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls have no direct equivalent in CSA CCM v4. The highest concentration of gaps is in OT Risk Management with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and CSA CCM v4?

The domain with the highest gap count is OT Risk Management (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.