Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-30vsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation

See exactly how NIST SP 800-30 controls map to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
75%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-30 maps to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation with 75% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST SP 800-30 controls identifies 2 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Communication and Sharing.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Risk Management Strategy(3 mappings)

NISTSP30-1Risk Management Strategy and Risk Assessment Programme Establishment3 targets
IS.D.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
IS.I.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
IS.I.OR.220Information Security Risk Management

Three-Tier Risk Assessment Scoping(3 mappings)

NISTSP30-2Three-Tier Risk Assessment Scoping (Organisation, Mission/Business, Information System)3 targets
IS.D.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
IS.I.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
IS.I.OR.220Information Security Risk Management

Threat Source and Event Identification(2 mappings)

NISTSP30-3Threat Source and Threat Event Identification2 targets
IS.D.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
IS.I.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment

Vulnerability and Predisposing Condition Identification(2 mappings)

NISTSP30-4Vulnerability and Predisposing Condition Identification2 targets
IS.D.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
IS.I.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment

Risk Determination(2 mappings)

NISTSP30-6Risk Determination, Uncertainty, and Sensitivity Analysis2 targets
IS.D.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
IS.I.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment

Risk Assessment Maintenance and RMF Integration(4 mappings)

NISTSP30-8Risk Assessment Maintenance, Continuous Monitoring, and Integration with the RMF4 targets
IS.AR.210Findings and Corrective Actions
IS.D.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
IS.I.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
IS.I.OR.220Information Security Risk Management

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-30 and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?

NIST SP 800-30 has 8 controls across its framework, while EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation covers 34 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (75% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Communication and Sharing, where 1 NIST SP 800-30 controls have no direct EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-30 and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?

Of 8 total NIST SP 800-30 controls, 6 map directly to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls — representing 75% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-30 to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?

2 NIST SP 800-30 controls have no direct equivalent in EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Communication and Sharing with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-30 and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Communication and Sharing (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.