TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsEASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
20
Gaps Found
17%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation with 17% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 29 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Access Control and Identification(1 mappings)

3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual
→IS.AR.210Findings and Corrective Actions

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(2 mappings)

3.11Risk Assessment2 targets
→IS.D.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
→IS.I.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment

Incident Response and Media Protection(12 mappings)

3.16System and Services Acquisition3 targets
→IS.D.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
→IS.I.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
→IS.I.OR.220Information Security Risk Management
3.17Supply Chain Risk Management3 targets
→IS.D.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
→IS.I.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
→IS.I.OR.220Information Security Risk Management
3.6Incident Response3 targets
→IS.AR.215Information Security Incident Response
→IS.D.OR.225External Reporting of Information Security Events
→IS.I.OR.225External Reporting
3.6.1Incident Response Plan Assessment3 targets
→IS.AR.215Information Security Incident Response
→IS.D.OR.225External Reporting of Information Security Events
→IS.I.OR.225External Reporting

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202121 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange20 mappings

Other EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation comparisons

TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation9 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation9 mappingsC2M2 vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsIEEE 1686 vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsNIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsAPI 1164 vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsEU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsCustoms-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation covers 18 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 15 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 6 map directly to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 29 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

29 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.