TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

South Korea ISMS-PvsEASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation

See exactly how South Korea ISMS-P controls map to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
9
Gaps Found
20%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

South Korea ISMS-P maps to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation with 20% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 20 South Korea ISMS-P controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Personal Information Processing.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 20 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Management System Requirements(6 mappings)

ISMSP-MS-02Risk Management5 targets
→IS.D.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
→IS.D.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
→IS.I.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
→IS.I.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
→IS.I.OR.220Information Security Risk Management
ISMSP-MS-04Management Review and Improvement
→IS.AR.210Findings and Corrective Actions

Protection Measures — System and Data Security(5 mappings)

ISMSP-SYS-04Vulnerability Management2 targets
→IS.D.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
→IS.I.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
ISMSP-SYS-05Incident Response3 targets
→IS.AR.215Information Security Incident Response
→IS.D.OR.225External Reporting of Information Security Events
→IS.I.OR.225External Reporting

Related Comparisons

Other South Korea ISMS-P comparisons

South Korea ISMS-P vs FedRAMP Rev 515 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs CSA CCM v415 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange15 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation14 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework14 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs NIST Privacy Framework 1.014 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)13 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 513 mappings

Other EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation9 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation9 mappingsC2M2 vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsIEEE 1686 vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsNIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsAPI 1164 vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsEU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsCustoms-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between South Korea ISMS-P and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

South Korea ISMS-P has 20 controls across its framework, while EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation covers 18 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Personal Information Processing, where 6 South Korea ISMS-P controls have no direct EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation equivalent.

How many controls map between South Korea ISMS-P and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

Of 20 total South Korea ISMS-P controls, 4 map directly to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping South Korea ISMS-P to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

16 South Korea ISMS-P controls have no direct equivalent in EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in Personal Information Processing with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between South Korea ISMS-P and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

The domain with the highest gap count is Personal Information Processing (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.