MTCS (Singapore)vsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation
See exactly how MTCS (Singapore) controls map to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
MTCS (Singapore) maps to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation with 2% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 155 MTCS (Singapore) controls identifies 152 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Annex A: cloud service provider disclosure – MTCS (Singapore).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 155 controls analysed | 1,016 frameworks | 316K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 11 of 11 control mappings across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 316K+ mappings across 1,016 frameworks.
Superseded batch representation – MTCS (Singapore)(11 mappings)
A MTCS (Singapore) to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls your existing MTCS (Singapore) work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 2% in the header counts how many MTCS (Singapore) controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other MTCS (Singapore) comparisons
Other EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 1,016 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 1,016 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (316K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between MTCS (Singapore) and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?
MTCS (Singapore) has 155 controls across its framework, while EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation covers 68 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (2% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Annex A: cloud service provider disclosure – MTCS (Singapore), where 26 MTCS (Singapore) controls have no direct EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation equivalent.
How many controls map between MTCS (Singapore) and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?
Of 155 total MTCS (Singapore) controls, 3 map directly to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls, representing 2% coverage. The remaining 152 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping MTCS (Singapore) to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?
152 MTCS (Singapore) controls have no direct equivalent in EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in Annex A: cloud service provider disclosure – MTCS (Singapore) with 26 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between MTCS (Singapore) and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?
The domain with the highest gap count is Annex A: cloud service provider disclosure – MTCS (Singapore) (26 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.