TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-30vsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how NIST SP 800-30 controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
75%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-30 maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 75% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST SP 800-30 controls identifies 2 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Communication and Sharing.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Risk Management Strategy(2 mappings)

NISTSP30-1Risk Management Strategy and Risk Assessment Programme Establishment2 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management

Three-Tier Risk Assessment Scoping(2 mappings)

NISTSP30-2Three-Tier Risk Assessment Scoping (Organisation, Mission/Business, Information System)2 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management

Threat Source and Event Identification(1 mappings)

NISTSP30-3Threat Source and Threat Event Identification
→3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest

Vulnerability and Predisposing Condition Identification(1 mappings)

NISTSP30-4Vulnerability and Predisposing Condition Identification
→3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest

Risk Determination(1 mappings)

NISTSP30-6Risk Determination, Uncertainty, and Sensitivity Analysis
→3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest

Risk Assessment Maintenance and RMF Integration(3 mappings)

NISTSP30-8Risk Assessment Maintenance, Continuous Monitoring, and Integration with the RMF3 targets
→3.1Physical Security
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-30 comparisons

NIST SP 800-30 vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers6 mappingsNIST SP 800-30 vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation6 mappingsNIST SP 800-30 vs AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System6 mappingsNIST SP 800-30 vs ISO/IEC 27003:20176 mappingsNIST SP 800-30 vs ISO 310006 mappingsNIST SP 800-30 vs ISO 270056 mappingsNIST SP 800-30 vs AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)6 mappingsNIST SP 800-30 vs NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)6 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements18 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements17 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements16 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-30 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

NIST SP 800-30 has 8 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (75% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Communication and Sharing, where 1 NIST SP 800-30 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-30 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 8 total NIST SP 800-30 controls, 6 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 75% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-30 to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

2 NIST SP 800-30 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Communication and Sharing with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-30 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Communication and Sharing (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.