Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-30vsISO 31000

See exactly how NIST SP 800-30 controls map to ISO 31000. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
75%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-30 maps to ISO 31000 with 75% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST SP 800-30 controls identifies 2 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Communication and Sharing.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

Risk Management Strategy(3 mappings)

NISTSP30-1Risk Management Strategy and Risk Assessment Programme Establishment3 targets
ISO31000-01Risk management policy and scope
ISO31000-05Risk management integration
ISO31000-18Risk register maintenance

Three-Tier Risk Assessment Scoping(3 mappings)

NISTSP30-2Three-Tier Risk Assessment Scoping (Organisation, Mission/Business, Information System)3 targets
ISO31000-01Risk management policy and scope
ISO31000-05Risk management integration
ISO31000-18Risk register maintenance

Threat Source and Event Identification(3 mappings)

NISTSP30-3Threat Source and Threat Event Identification3 targets
ISO31000-07Risk analysis and evaluation
ISO31000-09Risk scenario development
ISO31000-10Risk interdependency analysis

Vulnerability and Predisposing Condition Identification(3 mappings)

NISTSP30-4Vulnerability and Predisposing Condition Identification3 targets
ISO31000-07Risk analysis and evaluation
ISO31000-09Risk scenario development
ISO31000-10Risk interdependency analysis

Risk Determination(3 mappings)

NISTSP30-6Risk Determination, Uncertainty, and Sensitivity Analysis3 targets
ISO31000-07Risk analysis and evaluation
ISO31000-09Risk scenario development
ISO31000-10Risk interdependency analysis

Risk Assessment Maintenance and RMF Integration(4 mappings)

NISTSP30-8Risk Assessment Maintenance, Continuous Monitoring, and Integration with the RMF4 targets
ISO31000-01Risk management policy and scope
ISO31000-05Risk management integration
ISO31000-18Risk register maintenance
ISO31000-19Continuous improvement of risk processes

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 706 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-30 and ISO 31000?

NIST SP 800-30 has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO 31000 covers 43 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (75% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Communication and Sharing, where 1 NIST SP 800-30 controls have no direct ISO 31000 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-30 and ISO 31000?

Of 8 total NIST SP 800-30 controls, 6 map directly to ISO 31000 controls — representing 75% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-30 to ISO 31000?

2 NIST SP 800-30 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 31000. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Communication and Sharing with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-30 and ISO 31000?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Communication and Sharing (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.