TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NERC CIPvsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation

See exactly how NERC CIP controls map to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NERC CIP maps to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NERC CIP controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

System Security and Configuration(2 mappings)

NERCCIP-5System Security Management + Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments (CIP-007 + CIP-010)2 targets
→IS.D.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
→IS.I.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment

Incident and Recovery(3 mappings)

NERCCIP-6Incident Reporting and Response Planning + Recovery Plans (CIP-008 + CIP-009)3 targets
→IS.AR.215Information Security Incident Response
→IS.D.OR.225External Reporting of Information Security Events
→IS.I.OR.225External Reporting

Supply Chain Risk Management(3 mappings)

NERCCIP-8Supply Chain Risk Management (CIP-013)3 targets
→IS.D.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
→IS.I.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
→IS.I.OR.220Information Security Risk Management

Related Comparisons

Other NERC CIP comparisons

NERC CIP vs ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management3 mappingsNERC CIP vs APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management3 mappingsNERC CIP vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements3 mappingsNERC CIP vs APRA CPS 2343 mappingsNERC CIP vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)3 mappingsNERC CIP vs NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)3 mappingsNERC CIP vs FFIEC IT Examination Handbook3 mappingsNERC CIP vs IEC 624433 mappings

Other EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation9 mappingsNRF Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Framework (National Retail Federation) vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsNIS2 Directive vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsAPI 1164 vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsAnnex 11 to EU GMP - Computerised Systems vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation8 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NERC CIP and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?

NERC CIP has 8 controls across its framework, while EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation covers 34 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Protection, where 1 NERC CIP controls have no direct EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation equivalent.

How many controls map between NERC CIP and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?

Of 8 total NERC CIP controls, 3 map directly to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NERC CIP to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?

5 NERC CIP controls have no direct equivalent in EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Protection with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NERC CIP and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?

The domain with the highest gap count is Information Protection (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.