Cross-Framework Mapping

Nebraska Data Privacy ActvsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0

See exactly how Nebraska Data Privacy Act controls map to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
75%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Nebraska Data Privacy Act maps to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 with 75% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Nebraska Data Privacy Act controls identifies 2 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Security and Incident Response.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Scope and Applicability(6 mappings)

NDPA-1Applicability, Scope, and Carve-Outs6 targets
CPG-3.ALog Collection
CPG-3.BSecure Log Storage
CPG-3.CStrong and Agile Encryption
CPG-6.BSupply Chain Incident Reporting
CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation
CPG-8.CEncrypted DNS

Consumer Rights(2 mappings)

NDPA-2Consumer Rights - Access, Correct, Delete, Portability, Appeal2 targets
CPG-6.BSupply Chain Incident Reporting
CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation

Sensitive Data and Minors(1 mappings)

NDPA-4Sensitive Data Processing Consent and Childrens Protections
CPG-3.CStrong and Agile Encryption

Privacy Notice and Data Hygiene(1 mappings)

NDPA-5Privacy Notice, Data Minimisation, and Purpose Limitation
CPG-6.BSupply Chain Incident Reporting

Risk and Vendor Management(4 mappings)

NDPA-7Data Protection Assessments and Processor Contracts4 targets
CPG-3.ALog Collection
CPG-3.BSecure Log Storage
CPG-3.CStrong and Agile Encryption
CPG-8.CEncrypted DNS

Enforcement and Compliance(1 mappings)

NDPA-8Nebraska Attorney General Enforcement, Permanent 30-Day Cure, and Penalties
CPG-3.CStrong and Agile Encryption
Coverage crosswalk

A Nebraska Data Privacy Act to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls your existing Nebraska Data Privacy Act work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Nebraska Data Privacy Act into CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 into Nebraska Data Privacy Act
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

Nebraska Data Privacy Act to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 75% in the header counts how many Nebraska Data Privacy Act controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other Nebraska Data Privacy Act comparisons

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Nebraska Data Privacy Act and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

Nebraska Data Privacy Act has 8 controls across its framework, while CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (75% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security and Incident Response, where 1 Nebraska Data Privacy Act controls have no direct CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between Nebraska Data Privacy Act and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

Of 8 total Nebraska Data Privacy Act controls, 6 map directly to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls, representing 75% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Nebraska Data Privacy Act to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

2 Nebraska Data Privacy Act controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Security and Incident Response with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Nebraska Data Privacy Act and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security and Incident Response (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.