TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

MITRE ATT&CKvsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0

See exactly how MITRE ATT&CK controls map to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
75%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MITRE ATT&CK maps to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 with 75% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 MITRE ATT&CK controls identifies 2 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Detection Engineering and Data Sources - MITRE ATT&CK(3 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Detection-Data-Sources-Analytics-Sigma-Splunk-KQL-Yara-Snort-SIEM-Hunt-EngineeringMITRE ATT&CK Detection + Data Sources + Analytics + Sigma + Splunk + KQL + Yara + Snort + SIEM + Hunt3 targets
→CPG-1.DRevoking Credentials for Departing Employees
→CPG-5.AVulnerability Disclosure Program
→CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation

Matrices and Platforms - MITRE ATT&CK(5 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Matrices-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-Cloud-AWS-Azure-Google-Office-365-Container-Platform-SpecificMITRE ATT&CK Matrices + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + AWS + Azure + Google + Office 365 + Container5 targets
→CPG-1.AChanging Default Passwords
→CPG-1.CUnique Credentials
→CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training
→CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training
→CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation

Mitigations and Controls - MITRE ATT&CK(3 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Mitigations-M-IDs-Active-Directory-User-Account-Management-Password-Policies-Network-SegmentationMITRE ATT&CK Mitigations + M-IDs + Active Directory + User Account + Password + Network Segmentation + Application Control3 targets
→CPG-3.ALog Collection
→CPG-3.BSecure Log Storage
→CPG-8.CEncrypted DNS

Scope and Foundation - MITRE ATT&CK(1 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Scope-Adversarial-Tactics-Techniques-MITRE-Corporation-2013-v15-v16-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-CloudMITRE ATT&CK Scope + MITRE Corporation 2013 + v15 + v16 + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + Container
→CPG-6.BSupply Chain Incident Reporting

Tactics - MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Kill Chain(2 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Tactics-14-Enterprise-Kill-Chain-Reconnaissance-Initial-Access-Discovery-Lateral-Movement-ImpactMITRE ATT&CK 14 Enterprise Tactics + Reconnaissance + Initial Access + Discovery + Lateral Movement + Impact2 targets
→CPG-2.AAsset Inventory
→CPG-2.BProhibit Connection of Unauthorized Devices

Techniques and Sub-Techniques - MITRE ATT&CK(3 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Techniques-Sub-Techniques-200-600-T1078-T1059-T1566-T1190-T1486-Procedures-Adversary-BehaviourMITRE ATT&CK Techniques + 200+ + Sub-Techniques + 600+ + T1078 + T1059 + T1566 + T1190 + T1486 + Procedures3 targets
→CPG-2.AAsset Inventory
→CPG-2.BProhibit Connection of Unauthorized Devices
→CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation

Related Comparisons

Other MITRE ATT&CK comparisons

MITRE ATT&CK vs OWASP MASVS6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs OWASP ASVS6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs MITRE D3FEND6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs ISO 270436 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs ISO/SAE 214346 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs ISO 134855 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs OWASP Top 10:20255 mappings

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.014 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.014 mappingsOWASP ASVS vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.014 mappingsTISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.014 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between MITRE ATT&CK and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

MITRE ATT&CK has 8 controls across its framework, while CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (75% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK, where 1 MITRE ATT&CK controls have no direct CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between MITRE ATT&CK and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

Of 8 total MITRE ATT&CK controls, 6 map directly to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls — representing 75% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MITRE ATT&CK to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

2 MITRE ATT&CK controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MITRE ATT&CK and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.