TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

MITRE ATT&CKvsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how MITRE ATT&CK controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
62%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MITRE ATT&CK maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 62% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 MITRE ATT&CK controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

Detection Engineering and Data Sources - MITRE ATT&CK(2 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Detection-Data-Sources-Analytics-Sigma-Splunk-KQL-Yara-Snort-SIEM-Hunt-EngineeringMITRE ATT&CK Detection + Data Sources + Analytics + Sigma + Splunk + KQL + Yara + Snort + SIEM + Hunt2 targets
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
→FTC-Safeguards-ServiceProvider-EvaluationService Provider Oversight + Program Evaluation + Personnel Training (16 CFR 314.4(d-g))

Matrices and Platforms - MITRE ATT&CK(1 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Matrices-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-Cloud-AWS-Azure-Google-Office-365-Container-Platform-SpecificMITRE ATT&CK Matrices + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + AWS + Azure + Google + Office 365 + Container
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

Mitigations and Controls - MITRE ATT&CK(1 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Mitigations-M-IDs-Active-Directory-User-Account-Management-Password-Policies-Network-SegmentationMITRE ATT&CK Mitigations + M-IDs + Active Directory + User Account + Password + Network Segmentation + Application Control
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

Scope and Foundation - MITRE ATT&CK(1 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Scope-Adversarial-Tactics-Techniques-MITRE-Corporation-2013-v15-v16-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-CloudMITRE ATT&CK Scope + MITRE Corporation 2013 + v15 + v16 + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + Container
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)

Techniques and Sub-Techniques - MITRE ATT&CK(1 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Techniques-Sub-Techniques-200-600-T1078-T1059-T1566-T1190-T1486-Procedures-Adversary-BehaviourMITRE ATT&CK Techniques + 200+ + Sub-Techniques + 600+ + T1078 + T1059 + T1566 + T1190 + T1486 + Procedures
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

Related Comparisons

Other MITRE ATT&CK comparisons

MITRE ATT&CK vs OWASP MASVS6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs OWASP ASVS6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs MITRE D3FEND6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs ISO 270436 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs ISO/SAE 214346 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.06 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs ISO 134855 mappings

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsVermont Artificial Intelligence and Consumer Data Act (AICDA) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsLey Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia DPDP Act vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 2022 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 706 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between MITRE ATT&CK and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

MITRE ATT&CK has 8 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK, where 1 MITRE ATT&CK controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between MITRE ATT&CK and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 8 total MITRE ATT&CK controls, 5 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MITRE ATT&CK to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

3 MITRE ATT&CK controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MITRE ATT&CK and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.