TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

MITRE ATT&CKvsOWASP ASVS

See exactly how MITRE ATT&CK controls map to OWASP ASVS. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
75%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MITRE ATT&CK maps to OWASP ASVS with 75% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 MITRE ATT&CK controls identifies 2 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Detection Engineering and Data Sources - MITRE ATT&CK(4 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Detection-Data-Sources-Analytics-Sigma-Splunk-KQL-Yara-Snort-SIEM-Hunt-EngineeringMITRE ATT&CK Detection + Data Sources + Analytics + Sigma + Splunk + KQL + Yara + Snort + SIEM + Hunt4 targets
→OWASPASVS-10Malicious Code Verification (V10)
→OWASPASVS-7Error Handling and Logging (V7)
→OWASPASVS-8Data Protection (V8 + V8.3)
→OWASPASVS-9Communication Security (V9)

Matrices and Platforms - MITRE ATT&CK(2 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Matrices-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-Cloud-AWS-Azure-Google-Office-365-Container-Platform-SpecificMITRE ATT&CK Matrices + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + AWS + Azure + Google + Office 365 + Container2 targets
→OWASPASVS-2Authentication and Credential Storage (V2 + V2.4)
→OWASPASVS-4Access Control (V4 + V4.3)

Mitigations and Controls - MITRE ATT&CK(2 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Mitigations-M-IDs-Active-Directory-User-Account-Management-Password-Policies-Network-SegmentationMITRE ATT&CK Mitigations + M-IDs + Active Directory + User Account + Password + Network Segmentation + Application Control2 targets
→OWASPASVS-6Stored Cryptography (V6)
→OWASPASVS-9Communication Security (V9)

Scope and Foundation - MITRE ATT&CK(1 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Scope-Adversarial-Tactics-Techniques-MITRE-Corporation-2013-v15-v16-Enterprise-Mobile-ICS-CloudMITRE ATT&CK Scope + MITRE Corporation 2013 + v15 + v16 + Enterprise + Mobile + ICS + Cloud + Container
→OWASPASVS-1Architecture, Design and Threat Modelling (V1)

Tactics - MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Kill Chain(1 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Tactics-14-Enterprise-Kill-Chain-Reconnaissance-Initial-Access-Discovery-Lateral-Movement-ImpactMITRE ATT&CK 14 Enterprise Tactics + Reconnaissance + Initial Access + Discovery + Lateral Movement + Impact
→OWASPASVS-8Data Protection (V8 + V8.3)

Techniques and Sub-Techniques - MITRE ATT&CK(3 mappings)

MITRE-ATTACK-Techniques-Sub-Techniques-200-600-T1078-T1059-T1566-T1190-T1486-Procedures-Adversary-BehaviourMITRE ATT&CK Techniques + 200+ + Sub-Techniques + 600+ + T1078 + T1059 + T1566 + T1190 + T1486 + Procedures3 targets
→OWASPASVS-2Authentication and Credential Storage (V2 + V2.4)
→OWASPASVS-4Access Control (V4 + V4.3)
→OWASPASVS-8Data Protection (V8 + V8.3)

Related Comparisons

Other MITRE ATT&CK comparisons

MITRE ATT&CK vs OWASP MASVS6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs MITRE D3FEND6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices6 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs ISO 270436 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs ISO/SAE 214346 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.06 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs OWASP Top 10:20255 mappingsMITRE ATT&CK vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)5 mappings

Other OWASP ASVS comparisons

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs OWASP ASVS8 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs OWASP ASVS8 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs OWASP ASVS8 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs OWASP ASVS8 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs OWASP ASVS8 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs OWASP ASVS8 mappingsOpenSSF Scorecard vs OWASP ASVS8 mappingsNIST SP 800-92 vs OWASP ASVS8 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between MITRE ATT&CK and OWASP ASVS?

MITRE ATT&CK has 8 controls across its framework, while OWASP ASVS covers 14 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (75% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK, where 1 MITRE ATT&CK controls have no direct OWASP ASVS equivalent.

How many controls map between MITRE ATT&CK and OWASP ASVS?

Of 8 total MITRE ATT&CK controls, 6 map directly to OWASP ASVS controls — representing 75% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MITRE ATT&CK to OWASP ASVS?

2 MITRE ATT&CK controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP ASVS. The highest concentration of gaps is in Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MITRE ATT&CK and OWASP ASVS?

The domain with the highest gap count is Integration and Ecosystem - MITRE ATT&CK (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.