Cross-Framework Mapping

MITRE ATT&CKvsOWASP ASVS

See exactly how MITRE ATT&CK controls map to OWASP ASVS. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

39
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
58%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MITRE ATT&CK maps to OWASP ASVS with 58% coverage across 18 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 MITRE ATT&CK controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in MITRE ATT&CK: Communications Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 39 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

MITRE ATT&CK: Information Security Policies(1 mappings)

MITRE-04Roles and responsibilities definition
ASVS-04Roles and responsibilities definition

MITRE ATT&CK: Asset Management(10 mappings)

MITRE-06Asset inventory and ownership3 targets
ASVS-08Information classification and labeling
ASVS-09Asset handling procedures
ASVS-10Media management and disposal
MITRE-07Acceptable use of assets3 targets
ASVS-08Information classification and labeling
ASVS-09Asset handling procedures
ASVS-10Media management and disposal
MITRE-08Information classification and labeling
ASVS-08Information classification and labeling
MITRE-09Asset handling procedures3 targets
ASVS-08Information classification and labeling
ASVS-09Asset handling procedures
ASVS-10Media management and disposal

MITRE ATT&CK: Access Control(9 mappings)

MITRE-11Access control policy and enforcement3 targets
ASVS-11Access control policy and enforcement
ASVS-12User access management and provisioning
ASVS-13Authentication and password management
MITRE-12User access management and provisioning3 targets
ASVS-11Access control policy and enforcement
ASVS-12User access management and provisioning
ASVS-13Authentication and password management
MITRE-13Authentication and password management
ASVS-13Authentication and password management
MITRE-14Privileged access management2 targets
ASVS-11Access control policy and enforcement
ASVS-12User access management and provisioning

+19 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between MITRE ATT&CK and OWASP ASVS?

MITRE ATT&CK has 31 controls across its framework, while OWASP ASVS covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 18 overlapping controls (58% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in MITRE ATT&CK: Communications Security, where 4 MITRE ATT&CK controls have no direct OWASP ASVS equivalent.

How many controls map between MITRE ATT&CK and OWASP ASVS?

Of 31 total MITRE ATT&CK controls, 18 map directly to OWASP ASVS controls — representing 58% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MITRE ATT&CK to OWASP ASVS?

13 MITRE ATT&CK controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP ASVS. The highest concentration of gaps is in MITRE ATT&CK: Communications Security with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MITRE ATT&CK and OWASP ASVS?

The domain with the highest gap count is MITRE ATT&CK: Communications Security (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.