Cross-Framework Mapping

Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial InstitutionsvsNIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555)

See exactly how Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls map to NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

31
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
68%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions maps to NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) with 68% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cybersecurity Governance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 31 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Cybersecurity Governance(20 mappings)

FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-01Board and Senior Management Oversight3 targets
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
EU-NIS2-EN-ESO-01Risk Management Measures
EU-NIS2-EN-ESO-03Management Accountability
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment3 targets
EAR-COMP-01Export Compliance Programme
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
HBNR-ENF-01Record-Keeping Requirements
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management4 targets
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
EU-NIS2-EN-ESO-01Risk Management Measures
EU-NIS2-EN-ESO-03Management Accountability
EUDR-CE-03Penalties
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework6 targets
EAR-COMP-01Export Compliance Programme
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
EU-NIS2-EN-ESO-01Risk Management Measures
EU-NIS2-EN-ESO-03Management Accountability
HBNR-ENF-01Record-Keeping Requirements
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting
PNG-CC-CG-02NICTA Oversight
PSTI-CMP-03Enforcement and Penalties
PNG-CC-CG-03Incident Response
EU-NIS2-EN-ESO-02Incident Reporting

+11 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions comparisons

Other NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions and NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555)?

Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions has 19 controls across its framework, while NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (68% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cybersecurity Governance, where 6 Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls have no direct NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) equivalent.

How many controls map between Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions and NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555)?

Of 19 total Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls, 13 map directly to NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) controls — representing 68% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions to NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555)?

6 Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls have no direct equivalent in NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555). The highest concentration of gaps is in Cybersecurity Governance with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions and NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cybersecurity Governance (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.