TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial InstitutionsvsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)

See exactly how Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls map to CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

30
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
68%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions maps to CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) with 68% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cybersecurity Governance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 30 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Cybersecurity Governance(20 mappings)

FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities2 targets
→38.1051(c)(1)Recovery Time Objectives
→EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-01Board and Senior Management Oversight
→TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment3 targets
→38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs
→38.1051(h)(5)Enterprise Technology Risk Assessment
→39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management
→TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability2 targets
→38.1051(c)(1)Recovery Time Objectives
→EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework6 targets
→38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs
→38.1051(h)(2)Penetration Testing
→38.1051(h)(5)Enterprise Technology Risk Assessment
→39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs
→GLI33-4.2Penetration Testing
→TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management
PNG-CC-CG-02NICTA Oversight2 targets
→TSSR-INFO-2Stored Communications Security
→TSSR-INFO-3Lawful Interception Capability
PNG-CC-CG-03Incident Response
→38.1051(h)(4)Security Incident Response Plan Testing
RBI-CYB-GOV-01Board-Approved Cyber Security Policy2 targets
→38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs
→38.1051(h)(5)Enterprise Technology Risk Assessment

+10 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions comparisons

Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)13 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 202413 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555)13 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)12 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments12 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management12 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)12 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges12 mappings

Other CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) comparisons

Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)25 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)24 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)24 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)24 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)23 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)22 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)22 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)22 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions and CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?

Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions has 19 controls across its framework, while CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (68% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cybersecurity Governance, where 6 Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls have no direct CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) equivalent.

How many controls map between Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions and CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?

Of 19 total Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls, 13 map directly to CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls — representing 68% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions to CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?

6 Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls have no direct equivalent in CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49). The highest concentration of gaps is in Cybersecurity Governance with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions and CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cybersecurity Governance (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.