TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27005vsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0

See exactly how ISO 27005 controls map to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
38
Gaps Found
2%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27005 maps to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 with 2% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 40 ISO 27005 controls identifies 39 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Assessment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 40 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Communication(2 mappings)

9.1Risk communication and consultation2 targets
→CPG-3.ALog Collection
→CPG-3.BSecure Log Storage

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 27005 comparisons

ISO 27005 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements11 mappingsISO 27005 vs AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System11 mappingsISO 27005 vs ISO/IEC 27003:201711 mappingsISO 27005 vs AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence10 mappingsISO 27005 vs PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products8 mappingsISO 27005 vs NIST SP 800-398 mappingsISO 27005 vs NIST SP 800-378 mappingsISO 27005 vs NIST SP 800-308 mappings

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.014 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.014 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappingsNIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.013 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.012 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.012 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 27005 and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

ISO 27005 has 40 controls across its framework, while CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (2% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Assessment, where 8 ISO 27005 controls have no direct CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27005 and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

Of 40 total ISO 27005 controls, 1 map directly to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls — representing 2% coverage. The remaining 39 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27005 to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

39 ISO 27005 controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Assessment with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27005 and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Assessment (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.