Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27005vsISO/IEC 27003:2017

See exactly how ISO 27005 controls map to ISO/IEC 27003:2017. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
35%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27005 maps to ISO/IEC 27003:2017 with 35% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 20 ISO 27005 controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISO 27005: Risk Treatment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 20 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

ISO 27005: Risk Framework & Governance(6 mappings)

ISO27005-01Risk management policy and scope3 targets
AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control
ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
ISO27003-8.3Information Security Risk Treatment
ISO27005-05Risk management integration3 targets
AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control
ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
ISO27003-8.3Information Security Risk Treatment

ISO 27005: Risk Assessment(6 mappings)

ISO27005-06Risk identification methods2 targets
ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment
ISO27005-08Risk criteria and thresholds2 targets
ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment
ISO27005-10Risk interdependency analysis2 targets
ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment

ISO 27005: Risk Monitoring & Review(6 mappings)

ISO27005-18Risk register maintenance3 targets
AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control
ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
ISO27003-8.3Information Security Risk Treatment
ISO27005-19Continuous improvement of risk processes3 targets
AS9100D-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
ISO27003-10.1Continual Improvement
ISO27003-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27005 and ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

ISO 27005 has 20 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27003:2017 covers 57 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (35% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISO 27005: Risk Treatment, where 5 ISO 27005 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27003:2017 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27005 and ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

Of 20 total ISO 27005 controls, 7 map directly to ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls — representing 35% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27005 to ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

13 ISO 27005 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27003:2017. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISO 27005: Risk Treatment with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27005 and ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISO 27005: Risk Treatment (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.