FedRAMP Rev 5vsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0
See exactly how FedRAMP Rev 5 controls map to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
FedRAMP Rev 5 maps to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 with 33% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 12 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in FedRAMP: OMB M-24-15 Modernization, FedRAMP 2.0 and Coordination with StateRAMP / GovRAMP.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 12 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
FedRAMP: Baseline Selection (Low, Moderate, High, LI-SaaS) and Control Overlay Parameters(3 mappings)
FedRAMP: Authorization Boundary, SSP, SAR, POA&M and System Documentation(9 mappings)
FedRAMP: Continuous Monitoring (ConMon) and Significant Change Requests(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other FedRAMP Rev 5 comparisons
Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between FedRAMP Rev 5 and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
FedRAMP Rev 5 has 12 controls across its framework, while CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (33% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in FedRAMP: OMB M-24-15 Modernization, FedRAMP 2.0 and Coordination with StateRAMP / GovRAMP, where 2 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls have no direct CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 equivalent.
How many controls map between FedRAMP Rev 5 and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
Of 12 total FedRAMP Rev 5 controls, 4 map directly to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls — representing 33% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping FedRAMP Rev 5 to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
8 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in FedRAMP: OMB M-24-15 Modernization, FedRAMP 2.0 and Coordination with StateRAMP / GovRAMP with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between FedRAMP Rev 5 and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
The domain with the highest gap count is FedRAMP: OMB M-24-15 Modernization, FedRAMP 2.0 and Coordination with StateRAMP / GovRAMP (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.