FedRAMP Rev 5vsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0
See exactly how FedRAMP Rev 5 controls map to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
FedRAMP Rev 5 maps to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 with 13% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 68 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls identifies 66 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Superseded batch representation – FedRAMP Rev 5.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 68 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 23 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.
Superseded batch representation – FedRAMP Rev 5(20 mappings)
+3 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
A FedRAMP Rev 5 to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls your existing FedRAMP Rev 5 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 13% in the header counts how many FedRAMP Rev 5 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other FedRAMP Rev 5 comparisons
Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 868 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between FedRAMP Rev 5 and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
FedRAMP Rev 5 has 68 controls across its framework, while CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (13% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Superseded batch representation – FedRAMP Rev 5, where 13 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls have no direct CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 equivalent.
How many controls map between FedRAMP Rev 5 and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
Of 68 total FedRAMP Rev 5 controls, 9 map directly to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls, representing 13% coverage. The remaining 66 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping FedRAMP Rev 5 to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
66 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Superseded batch representation – FedRAMP Rev 5 with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between FedRAMP Rev 5 and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
The domain with the highest gap count is Superseded batch representation – FedRAMP Rev 5 (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.