FedRAMP Rev 5vsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)
See exactly how FedRAMP Rev 5 controls map to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
FedRAMP Rev 5 maps to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) with 42% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 12 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls identifies 7 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in FedRAMP: OMB M-24-15 Modernization, FedRAMP 2.0 and Coordination with StateRAMP / GovRAMP.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 12 controls analysed | 715 frameworks | 415K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 415K+ mappings across 715 frameworks.
FedRAMP: Baseline Selection (Low, Moderate, High, LI-SaaS) and Control Overlay Parameters(1 mappings)
FedRAMP: Authorization Boundary, SSP, SAR, POA&M and System Documentation(5 mappings)
FedRAMP: Continuous Monitoring (ConMon) and Significant Change Requests(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other FedRAMP Rev 5 comparisons
Other HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 715 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 715 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (415K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between FedRAMP Rev 5 and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
FedRAMP Rev 5 has 12 controls across its framework, while HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (42% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in FedRAMP: OMB M-24-15 Modernization, FedRAMP 2.0 and Coordination with StateRAMP / GovRAMP, where 2 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls have no direct HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) equivalent.
How many controls map between FedRAMP Rev 5 and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
Of 12 total FedRAMP Rev 5 controls, 5 map directly to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls — representing 42% coverage. The remaining 7 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping FedRAMP Rev 5 to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
7 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls have no direct equivalent in HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF). The highest concentration of gaps is in FedRAMP: OMB M-24-15 Modernization, FedRAMP 2.0 and Coordination with StateRAMP / GovRAMP with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between FedRAMP Rev 5 and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
The domain with the highest gap count is FedRAMP: OMB M-24-15 Modernization, FedRAMP 2.0 and Coordination with StateRAMP / GovRAMP (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.