TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FedRAMP ModeratevsDORA

See exactly how FedRAMP Moderate controls map to DORA. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

76
Controls Mapped
247
Gaps Found
24%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which DORA controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FedRAMP Moderate maps to DORA with 24% coverage across 76 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls identifies 247 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in AC - Access Control.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 323 controls analysed | 1,016 frameworks | 316K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 104 control mappings across 14 domains. Sign up to explore all 316K+ mappings across 1,016 frameworks.

AC - Access Control(3 mappings)

AC-2Account Management
→DORA-Art.9Protection and prevention
AC-21Information Sharing
→DORA-Art.45Information-sharing arrangements on cyber threat information and intelligence
AC-3Access Enforcement
→DORA-Art.9Protection and prevention

AT - Awareness and Training(4 mappings)

AT-1Policy and Procedures
→DORA-Art.13Learning and evolving
AT-2Literacy Training and Awareness
→DORA-Art.13Learning and evolving
AT-3Role-Based Training
→DORA-Art.13Learning and evolving
AT-4Training Records
→DORA-Art.13Learning and evolving

AU - Audit and Accountability(2 mappings)

AU-4Audit Log Storage Capacity
→DORA-Art.7ICT systems, protocols and tools
AU-6Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting
→DORA-Art.10Detection

CA - Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring(11 mappings)

CA-1Policy and Procedures
→DORA-Art.24General requirements for the performance of digital operational resilience testing
CA-2Control Assessments2 targets
→DORA-Art.24General requirements for the performance of digital operational resilience testing
→DORA-Art.6ICT risk management framework
CA-2(1)Independent Assessors2 targets
→DORA-Art.27Requirements for testers for the carrying out of TLPT
→DORA-Art.6ICT risk management framework
CA-3Information Exchange
→DORA-Art.30Key contractual provisions
CA-5Plan of Action and Milestones2 targets
→DORA-Art.13Learning and evolving
→DORA-Art.50Administrative penalties and remedial measures
CA-6Authorization
→DORA-Art.5Governance and organisation
CA-7Continuous Monitoring2 targets
→DORA-Art.10Detection
→DORA-Art.24General requirements for the performance of digital operational resilience testing

+84 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 1,016 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The FedRAMP Moderate to DORA crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which DORA controls your existing FedRAMP Moderate work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. FedRAMP Moderate into DORA lands at 42.3%, while DORA into FedRAMP Moderate lands at 11.5%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your FedRAMP Moderate evidence buys you for DORA, the other asks the reverse.

FedRAMP Moderate into DORA
42.3%

11 of 26 DORA controls are evidenced by work you have already done for FedRAMP Moderate. 15 are genuine gaps.

DORA into FedRAMP Moderate
11.5%

37 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls are evidenced by work you have already done for DORA. 286 are genuine gaps.

FedRAMP Moderate to DORA
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 24% in the header counts how many FedRAMP Moderate controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many DORA controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other FedRAMP Moderate comparisons

FedRAMP Moderate vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5322 mappingsFedRAMP Moderate vs ISO 27002:2022318 mappingsFedRAMP Moderate vs SOC 2301 mappingsFedRAMP Moderate vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 HIGH296 mappingsFedRAMP Moderate vs ISO 27001:2022293 mappingsFedRAMP Moderate vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE287 mappingsFedRAMP Moderate vs PCI DSS 4.0265 mappingsFedRAMP Moderate vs Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1251 mappings

Other DORA comparisons

FedRAMP High vs DORA26 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs DORA26 mappingsCloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 vs DORA26 mappingsCIS Controls v8 vs DORA25 mappingsISO 27002:2022 vs DORA25 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs DORA25 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs DORA24 mappingsSOC 2 vs DORA24 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 1,016 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 1,016 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (316K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FedRAMP Moderate and DORA?

FedRAMP Moderate has 323 controls across its framework, while DORA covers 26 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 76 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AC - Access Control, where 40 FedRAMP Moderate controls have no direct DORA equivalent.

How many controls map between FedRAMP Moderate and DORA?

Of 323 total FedRAMP Moderate controls, 76 map directly to DORA controls, representing 24% coverage. The remaining 247 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FedRAMP Moderate to DORA?

247 FedRAMP Moderate controls have no direct equivalent in DORA. The highest concentration of gaps is in AC - Access Control with 40 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FedRAMP Moderate and DORA?

The domain with the highest gap count is AC - Access Control (40 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.