Cross-Framework Mapping

FedRAMP ModeratevsISO 27002:2022

See exactly how FedRAMP Moderate controls map to ISO 27002:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

676
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
98%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which ISO 27002:2022 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FedRAMP Moderate maps to ISO 27002:2022 with 98% coverage across 318 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls identifies 5 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in RA - Risk Assessment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 323 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 676 mapped controls across 18 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

AC - Access Control(20 mappings)

AC-1Policy and Procedures2 targets
iso-27002-2022::5.1Policies for information security
iso-27002-2022::5.15Access control
AC-11Device Lock3 targets
iso-27002-2022::7.7Clear desk and clear screen
iso-27002-2022::8.1User endpoint devices
iso-27002-2022::8.5Secure authentication
AC-11(1)Device Lock | Pattern-hiding Displays. Conceal, via the device lock, information previously visible on the display with a publicly viewable image2 targets
iso-27002-2022::7.7Clear desk and clear screen
iso-27002-2022::8.1User endpoint devices
AC-12Session Termination2 targets
iso-27002-2022::5.15Access control
iso-27002-2022::8.5Secure authentication
AC-14Permitted Actions Without Identification or Authentication
iso-27002-2022::5.15Access control
AC-17Remote Access
iso-27002-2022::6.7Remote working
AC-17(1)Monitoring and Control
iso-27002-2022::6.7Remote working
AC-17(2)Protection of Confidentiality and Integrity Using Encryption2 targets
iso-27002-2022::6.7Remote working
iso-27002-2022::8.24Use of cryptography
AC-17(3)Managed Access Control Points
iso-27002-2022::6.7Remote working
AC-17(4)Privileged Commands and Access4 targets
iso-27002-2022::6.7Remote working
iso-27002-2022::8.18Use of privileged utility programs
iso-27002-2022::8.2Privileged access rights
iso-27002-2022::8.5Secure authentication
AC-18Wireless Access
iso-27002-2022::8.21Security of network services

+656 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The FedRAMP Moderate to ISO 27002:2022 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO 27002:2022 controls your existing FedRAMP Moderate work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. FedRAMP Moderate into ISO 27002:2022 lands at 80.6%, while ISO 27002:2022 into FedRAMP Moderate lands at 56.3%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your FedRAMP Moderate evidence buys you for ISO 27002:2022, the other asks the reverse.

FedRAMP Moderate into ISO 27002:2022
80.6%

75 of 93 ISO 27002:2022 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for FedRAMP Moderate. 18 are genuine gaps.

81.1%Organizational controls
79.4%Technological controls
78.6%Physical controls
87.5%People controls
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 205 candidate mappings were examined and 31 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: 5.1 Policies for information security

Planning policy and procedures are documented, disseminated, reviewed and updated on schedule.

Grounded in PL-1 Policy and Procedures. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: 5.13 Labelling of information

Requires a matching set of information labelling procedures to be developed and implemented, so that information carries markings consistent with the classification scheme the organisation has adopted.

Every one of the 75 evidenced controls and 18 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

ISO 27002:2022 into FedRAMP Moderate
56.3%

182 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ISO 27002:2022. 141 are genuine gaps.

60.5%AC - Access Control
74.1%CM - Configuration Management
84.2%PE - Physical and Environmental Protection
66.7%SA - System and Services Acquisition
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 684 candidate mappings were examined and 348 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: AC-1 Policy and Procedures

Requires an access control policy based on business and security requirements.

Grounded in iso-27002-2022::5.15 Access control. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: AC-12 Session Termination

Automatically terminate user session after FedRAMP-defined conditions (idle timeout, trigger events).

Every one of the 182 evidenced controls and 141 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

FedRAMP Moderate to ISO 27002:2022
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 98% in the header counts how many FedRAMP Moderate controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO 27002:2022 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FedRAMP Moderate and ISO 27002:2022?

FedRAMP Moderate has 323 controls across its framework, while ISO 27002:2022 covers 93 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 318 overlapping controls (98% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in RA - Risk Assessment, where 1 FedRAMP Moderate controls have no direct ISO 27002:2022 equivalent.

How many controls map between FedRAMP Moderate and ISO 27002:2022?

Of 323 total FedRAMP Moderate controls, 318 map directly to ISO 27002:2022 controls, representing 98% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FedRAMP Moderate to ISO 27002:2022?

5 FedRAMP Moderate controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27002:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in RA - Risk Assessment with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FedRAMP Moderate and ISO 27002:2022?

The domain with the highest gap count is RA - Risk Assessment (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.