Cross-Framework Mapping

FedRAMP ModeratevsSOC 2

See exactly how FedRAMP Moderate controls map to SOC 2. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

723
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
93%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which SOC 2 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FedRAMP Moderate maps to SOC 2 with 93% coverage across 301 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls identifies 22 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in SA - System and Services Acquisition.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 323 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 723 mapped controls across 18 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.

AC - Access Control(20 mappings)

AC-1Policy and Procedures
→SOC2-CC5.3CC5.3 Deploying controls through policies and procedures (COSO principle 12)
AC-11Device Lock
→SOC2-CC6.1CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets
AC-11(1)Device Lock | Pattern-hiding Displays (AC-11(1))2 targets
→SOC2-C1.1C1.1 Identifying and maintaining confidential information
→SOC2-CC6.1CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets
AC-12Session Termination
→SOC2-CC6.1CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets
AC-14Permitted Actions Without Identification or Authentication2 targets
→SOC2-CC6.2CC6.2 Registering and authorising users before issuing credentials
→SOC2-CC6.3CC6.3 Role-based access, least privilege and segregation of duties
AC-17Remote Access4 targets
→SOC2-CC6.1CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets
→SOC2-CC6.2CC6.2 Registering and authorising users before issuing credentials
→SOC2-CC6.6CC6.6 Protection against threats from outside the system boundary
→SOC2-CC6.7CC6.7 Restricting and protecting information in transmission, movement and removal
AC-17(1)Monitoring and Control2 targets
→SOC2-CC6.6CC6.6 Protection against threats from outside the system boundary
→SOC2-CC7.1CC7.1 Detecting configuration changes and new vulnerabilities
AC-17(2)Protection of Confidentiality and Integrity Using Encryption2 targets
→SOC2-C1.1C1.1 Identifying and maintaining confidential information
→SOC2-CC6.1CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets
AC-17(3)Managed Access Control Points
→SOC2-CC6.1CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets
AC-18(1)Authentication and Encryption2 targets
→SOC2-CC6.1CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets
→SOC2-CC6.7CC6.7 Restricting and protecting information in transmission, movement and removal
AC-18(3)Wireless Access | Disable Wireless Networking (AC-18(3))
→SOC2-CC6.1CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets
AC-19Access Control for Mobile Devices
→SOC2-CC5.2CC5.2 General controls over technology (COSO principle 11)

+703 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The FedRAMP Moderate to SOC 2 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which SOC 2 controls your existing FedRAMP Moderate work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. FedRAMP Moderate into SOC 2 lands at 60.7%, while SOC 2 into FedRAMP Moderate lands at 14.9%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your FedRAMP Moderate evidence buys you for SOC 2, the other asks the reverse.

FedRAMP Moderate into SOC 2
60.7%

37 of 61 SOC 2 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for FedRAMP Moderate. 24 are genuine gaps.

SOC 2 into FedRAMP Moderate
14.9%

48 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls are evidenced by work you have already done for SOC 2. 275 are genuine gaps.

FedRAMP Moderate to SOC 2
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 93% in the header counts how many FedRAMP Moderate controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many SOC 2 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 868 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FedRAMP Moderate and SOC 2?

FedRAMP Moderate has 323 controls across its framework, while SOC 2 covers 61 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 301 overlapping controls (93% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SA - System and Services Acquisition, where 7 FedRAMP Moderate controls have no direct SOC 2 equivalent.

How many controls map between FedRAMP Moderate and SOC 2?

Of 323 total FedRAMP Moderate controls, 301 map directly to SOC 2 controls, representing 93% coverage. The remaining 22 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FedRAMP Moderate to SOC 2?

22 FedRAMP Moderate controls have no direct equivalent in SOC 2. The highest concentration of gaps is in SA - System and Services Acquisition with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FedRAMP Moderate and SOC 2?

The domain with the highest gap count is SA - System and Services Acquisition (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.