FedRAMP ModeratevsISO 27001:2022
See exactly how FedRAMP Moderate controls map to ISO 27001:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which ISO 27001:2022 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
FedRAMP Moderate maps to ISO 27001:2022 with 0% coverage across 293 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 238 FedRAMP Moderate controls identifies 30 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in AC - Access Control.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 238 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 651 mapped controls across 18 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
AC - Access Control(20 mappings)
+631 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The FedRAMP Moderate to ISO 27001:2022 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO 27001:2022 controls your existing FedRAMP Moderate work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. FedRAMP Moderate into ISO 27001:2022 lands at 80.6%, while ISO 27001:2022 into FedRAMP Moderate lands at 49.8%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your FedRAMP Moderate evidence buys you for ISO 27001:2022, the other asks the reverse.
75 of 93 ISO 27001:2022 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for FedRAMP Moderate. 18 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Planning policy and procedures are documented, disseminated, reviewed and updated on schedule.
Grounded in PL-1 Policy and Procedures. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Label information consistently with the classification scheme so handling rules can follow it.
Every one of the 75 evidenced controls and 18 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
161 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ISO 27001:2022. 162 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Policies for information security include the access control policy.
Grounded in iso-27001-2022::5.1 Policies for information security. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Device Lock | Pattern-hiding Displays. Conceal, via the device lock, information previously visible on the display with a publicly viewable image
Every one of the 161 evidenced controls and 162 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 0% in the header counts how many FedRAMP Moderate controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO 27001:2022 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other FedRAMP Moderate comparisons
Other ISO 27001:2022 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between FedRAMP Moderate and ISO 27001:2022?
FedRAMP Moderate has 238 controls across its framework, while ISO 27001:2022 covers 100 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 293 overlapping controls (0% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AC - Access Control, where 8 FedRAMP Moderate controls have no direct ISO 27001:2022 equivalent.
How many controls map between FedRAMP Moderate and ISO 27001:2022?
Of 238 total FedRAMP Moderate controls, 293 map directly to ISO 27001:2022 controls, representing 0% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping FedRAMP Moderate to ISO 27001:2022?
30 FedRAMP Moderate controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27001:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in AC - Access Control with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between FedRAMP Moderate and ISO 27001:2022?
The domain with the highest gap count is AC - Access Control (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.