Cross-Framework Mapping

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1vsDORA

Name: Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 to DORA Control Mapping Dataset
Creator: TheArtOfService

See exactly how Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls map to DORA. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

109

Controls Mapped

Gaps Found

43%

Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which DORA controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 maps to DORA with 43% coverage across 84 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 197 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls identifies 113 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 197 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 109 mapped controls across 16 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

A&A - Audit & Assurance(6 mappings)

CCM-A&A-01Audit and Assurance Policy and Procedures

→DORA-Art.6ICT risk management framework

CCM-A&A-02Independent Assessments

→DORA-Art.6ICT risk management framework

CCM-A&A-03Risk Based Planning Assessment

→DORA-Art.24General requirements for the performance of digital operational resilience testing

CCM-A&A-04Requirements Compliance

→DORA-Art.50Administrative penalties and remedial measures

CCM-A&A-06Remediation2 targets

→DORA-Art.13Learning and evolving

→DORA-Art.50Administrative penalties and remedial measures

AIS - Application & Interface Security(1 mappings)

CCM-AIS-05Automated Application Security Testing

→DORA-Art.25Testing of ICT tools and systems

BCR - Business Continuity Management & Operational Resilience(13 mappings)

CCM-BCR-01Business Continuity Management Policy and Procedures

→DORA-Art.11Response and recovery

CCM-BCR-02Risk Assessment and Impact Analysis

→DORA-Art.8Identification

CCM-BCR-03Business Continuity Strategy

→DORA-Art.11Response and recovery

CCM-BCR-04Business Continuity Planning2 targets

→DORA-Art.11Response and recovery

→DORA-Art.16Simplified ICT risk management framework

CCM-BCR-05Documentation

→DORA-Art.12Backup policies and procedures, restoration and recovery

CCM-BCR-06Business Continuity Exercises2 targets

→DORA-Art.11Response and recovery

→DORA-Art.24General requirements for the performance of digital operational resilience testing

CCM-BCR-07Communication

→DORA-Art.14Communication

CCM-BCR-08Backup

→DORA-Art.12Backup policies and procedures, restoration and recovery

CCM-BCR-09Disaster Response Plan

→DORA-Art.11Response and recovery

CCM-BCR-10Response Plan Exercise

→DORA-Art.24General requirements for the performance of digital operational resilience testing

CCM-BCR-11Equipment Redundancy

→DORA-Art.12Backup policies and procedures, restoration and recovery

+89 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 to DORA crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which DORA controls your existing Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 into DORA lands at 57.7%, while DORA into Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 lands at 19.8%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 evidence buys you for DORA, the other asks the reverse.

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 into DORA

57.7%

15 of 26 DORA controls are evidenced by work you have already done for Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1. 11 are genuine gaps.

81.8%DORA Chapter II: ICT Risk Management

50%DORA Chapter V: ICT Third-Party Risk Management

66.7%DORA Chapters VI-VII: Information Sharing, Penalties and Data Protection

25%DORA Chapter III: ICT-Related Incident Management

Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-20. 79 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: DORA-Art.10 Detection

Immediate reporting of monitoring system failures and anomalies supplies a further layer of control.

Grounded in CCM-LOG-13 Failures and Anomalies Reporting. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: DORA-Art.16 Simplified ICT risk management framework

Specified smaller and non-interconnected financial entities are subject to a simplified ICT risk management framework with proportionate requirements (sound systems, monitoring, business continuity, incident handling and testing).

Every one of the 15 evidenced controls and 11 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

DORA into Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1

19.8%

39 of 197 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for DORA. 158 are genuine gaps.

54.5%BCR - Business Continuity Management & Operational Resilience

75%SEF - Security Incident Management, E-Discovery & Cloud Forensics

62.5%GRC - Governance, Risk & Compliance

35.7%STA - Supply Chain Management, Transparency & Accountability

Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-20. 71 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: CCM-A&A-02 Independent Assessments

The framework must be audited periodically by staff holding ICT audit competence.

Grounded in DORA-Art.6 ICT risk management framework. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: CCM-A&A-01 Audit and Assurance Policy and Procedures

Maintain approved audit and assurance policies, procedures and standards that are documented, communicated to the staff they bind, applied in practice, and reassessed at least once a year.

Every one of the 39 evidenced controls and 158 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 to DORA

$299

per framework pair, one time

Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
Every gap, with what it requires
Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 43% in the header counts how many Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many DORA controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 comparisons

Other DORA comparisons

FedRAMP Moderate vs DORA26 mappings NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH vs DORA26 mappings FedRAMP High vs DORA26 mappings NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs DORA26 mappings NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE vs DORA25 mappings CIS Controls v8 vs DORA25 mappings ISO 27002:2022 vs DORA25 mappings ISO 27001:2022 vs DORA25 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

✓ 686 framework browser
✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
✓ 824 compliance assessments
✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day

Get Started Free

Recommended

$149/month

Professional

✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
✓ Unlimited full-text search
✓ Framework self-assessment
✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports

Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53 ISO 27001 vs NIST CSF CMMC vs NIST 800-53 FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53 NIST CSF vs SOC 2 HIPAA vs NIST 800-53 ISO 27001 vs SOC 2 ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and DORA?

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 has 197 controls across its framework, while DORA covers 26 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 84 overlapping controls (43% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management, where 19 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls have no direct DORA equivalent.

How many controls map between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and DORA?

Of 197 total Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls, 84 map directly to DORA controls, representing 43% coverage. The remaining 113 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 to DORA?

113 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls have no direct equivalent in DORA. The highest concentration of gaps is in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management with 19 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and DORA?

The domain with the highest gap count is CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management (19 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.