Cross-Framework Mapping

FedRAMP ModeratevsCloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1

See exactly how FedRAMP Moderate controls map to Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

467
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
78%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FedRAMP Moderate maps to Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 with 78% coverage across 251 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls identifies 72 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in IA - Identification and Authentication.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 323 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 467 mapped controls across 18 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

AC - Access Control(20 mappings)

AC-1Policy and Procedures
CCM-IAM-01Identity and Access Management Policy and Procedures
AC-11Device Lock
CCM-UEM-06Automatic Lock Screen
AC-11(1)Device Lock | Pattern-hiding Displays. Conceal, via the device lock, information previously visible on the display with a publicly viewable image
CCM-UEM-06Automatic Lock Screen
AC-17Remote Access2 targets
CCM-HRS-04Remote and Home Working Policy and Procedures
CCM-IVS-03Network Security
AC-17(1)Monitoring and Control2 targets
CCM-IVS-03Network Security
CCM-LOG-03Security Monitoring and Alerting
AC-17(2)Protection of Confidentiality and Integrity Using Encryption
CCM-CEK-03Data Encryption
AC-17(3)Managed Access Control Points
CCM-IVS-03Network Security
AC-17(4)Privileged Commands and Access
CCM-IAM-10Management of Privileged Access Roles
AC-19Access Control for Mobile Devices2 targets
CCM-UEM-01Endpoint Devices Policy and Procedures
CCM-UEM-05Endpoint Management
AC-19(5)Full Device or Container-Based Encryption
CCM-UEM-08Storage Encryption
AC-2Account Management4 targets
CCM-IAM-03Identity Inventory
CCM-IAM-06User Access Provisioning
CCM-IAM-07User Access Changes and Revocation
CCM-IAM-08User Access Review
AC-2(1)Automated System Account Management
CCM-IAM-06User Access Provisioning
AC-2(12)Account Monitoring for Atypical Usage
CCM-LOG-03Security Monitoring and Alerting
AC-2(13)Disable Accounts for High-Risk Individuals
CCM-IAM-07User Access Changes and Revocation

+447 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The FedRAMP Moderate to Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls your existing FedRAMP Moderate work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. FedRAMP Moderate into Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 lands at 60.4%, while Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 into FedRAMP Moderate lands at 34.1%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your FedRAMP Moderate evidence buys you for Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1, the other asks the reverse.

FedRAMP Moderate into Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1
60.4%

119 of 197 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for FedRAMP Moderate. 78 are genuine gaps.

87.5%IAM - Identity & Access Management
80%DCS - Datacenter Security
84.6%HRS - Human Resources Security
84.6%LOG - Logging & Monitoring
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 292 candidate mappings were examined and 1 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair. This pair was additionally re-checked after CSA CCM v4.0.1 was rebuilt from the CAIQ v4.0.1 source on 2026-08-19: its mappings were originally judged when CCM carried no requirement text, a sample of 70 across the 21 CCM pairs found about 80 percent holding cleanly, and the two identified errors were corrected before release.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: CCM-A&A-01 Audit and Assurance Policy and Procedures

Assessment policy and procedures are documented, approved and reviewed on a defined cycle.

Grounded in CA-1 Policy and Procedures. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: CCM-A&A-04 Requirements Compliance

Confirm during each audit that the organisation meets every standard, regulation, contract clause and statutory obligation inside the audit scope, and record the outcome for each one.

Every one of the 119 evidenced controls and 78 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 into FedRAMP Moderate
34.1%

110 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls are evidenced by work you have already done for Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1. 213 are genuine gaps.

32.6%AC - Access Control
44.4%CM - Configuration Management
57.9%PE - Physical and Environmental Protection
62.5%AU - Audit and Accountability
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 349 candidate mappings were examined and 3 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair. This pair was additionally re-checked after CSA CCM v4.0.1 was rebuilt from the CAIQ v4.0.1 source on 2026-08-19: its mappings were originally judged when CCM carried no requirement text, a sample of 70 across the 21 CCM pairs found about 80 percent holding cleanly, and the two identified errors were corrected before release.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: AC-1 Policy and Procedures

Identity and access management policy and procedures are the same policy artefact.

Grounded in CCM-IAM-01 Identity and Access Management Policy and Procedures. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: AC-11(1) Device Lock | Pattern-hiding Displays. Conceal, via the device lock, information...

Device Lock | Pattern-hiding Displays. Conceal, via the device lock, information previously visible on the display with a publicly viewable image

Every one of the 110 evidenced controls and 213 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

FedRAMP Moderate to Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 78% in the header counts how many FedRAMP Moderate controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FedRAMP Moderate and Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1?

FedRAMP Moderate has 323 controls across its framework, while Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 covers 197 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 251 overlapping controls (78% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in IA - Identification and Authentication, where 10 FedRAMP Moderate controls have no direct Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 equivalent.

How many controls map between FedRAMP Moderate and Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1?

Of 323 total FedRAMP Moderate controls, 251 map directly to Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls, representing 78% coverage. The remaining 72 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FedRAMP Moderate to Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1?

72 FedRAMP Moderate controls have no direct equivalent in Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1. The highest concentration of gaps is in IA - Identification and Authentication with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FedRAMP Moderate and Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1?

The domain with the highest gap count is IA - Identification and Authentication (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.